Chapter 3 : Academic Activities
|LINGUISTIC WRITINGS, Dohākosas and Caryā Songs||Bengali Grammar|
|History of the Bengali Language||Regional Dialect Dictionary of East Pakistan|
|Outlines of the Historical Grammar of the Bengali Language||Etymologies of Kubhā-, lagh-, eagh-, gevayā and laghulo [in the Inscriptions of Aśoka ]|
|Magadhi Prakrit and Bengali||Les sons du Bengali|
|Munda Affinities of Bengali||Bānglā O Tāhār Sahodarā Bhāsāy Bartamān Kāler Uitampurus|
|Philology and Indian Linguistics; Scientific Study of the Sanskrit Language||Bengali Spelling and Its Problems|
|Indo-Aryan Linguistics||The Common Origin of Urdu and Bengali|
|Origin of the Sinhalese Language||LITERARY WRITINGS; History of the Bengali Literature|
Shahidullah is primarily a
linguist — a linguist of the first generation of the
His writings on various subjects can be grouped into the following broad categories : A) Linguistic writings and B) Literary writings. I propose to discuss the works of Shahidullah on linguistics, published in books. I have taken up later his various articles published from time to time in the major journals of the period.
DOHĀKOŞAS AND CAUYĀ SONGS
Towards the close of the first millennium after Christ Eastern India witnessed the rise and growth of a new form of mysticism which has left its mark on the Bengali literature. This is the Sahajayāna which represents a later phase of Mahayāna Buddhism. The great teachers of this new form of mysticism were all known as Siddhas. The texts of the mystic songs composed by various Siddhas were discovered by Haraprasad Sastri in a manuscript incompletely preserved in Nepal Darbar Library (1907). Sastri published the text in 1916 under the title Hājār Bacharer Purāņa Bāngālā Bhāşāy Bauddha Cān O Dohā which contained four separate books, viz., 1) Caryācaryaviniścaya with Sanskrit commentary, 2) Dohākoşa of Saroruhavajra with Sanskrit commentary, 3) Dohākoşa of Krsnacaryapada with Sanskrit commentary and 4) a short tantra, entitled Dākarņava. In its introduction, Sastri wrote :
Caryācaryaviniścaya is the name of the manuscript that contains the songs called Caryagiti. The manuscript contains 46 complete songs and a fragment of one song. The manuscript consists of 69 folios, written on both sides. 5 folios were missing (fol. 35-38 and 66). The missing folios contain three complete songs (24, 25, 48) and the last four lines of a song (23).2 The name of the commentator, not mentioned in the text, is Munidatta, who wrote his expository treatise on the songs in Sanskrit prose.3
The songs represent an early variety of the Bengali language which had just emerged from the Apabhramsa stage. It presents not only the first document of Bengali literature but is, at the same time, the oldest available specimen of a New Indian literature in general. Suniti Kumar Chatterji studied the language of the text and characterised it as old Bengali. He gave his reasons in detail in his book ODBL (1926). The most definite Bengali characteristics of the language are :
'the genitive in -era, -ara; dative in-re; locative in-ta; postpositional words like majha, antara, sanga; past and future bases in – il -, - ib - and not -al-, -ab- of Bihari; present participle in -anta; conjunctive indeclinable in -ia; conjunctive conditional in-ile; passive in -ia; which is preserved as a relic in Middle Bengali; substantive roots ach- and thak-, not thik— of Maithili or tha- of Oriya and a number of Bengali idioms'.4
Sastri who did the
pioneering role in publishing the Buddhist Dohas was unable to identify its
language as Apabhramsa. The language of the Dohākoşas (Doha
Collections) is written in a Late or simplified form of Apabhramśa
which according to the testimony of Advayavajra was known as Abhibhraşta,
('fallen away'yoff standard). Advayavajra at the end of Saraha's
Dohākoşa-panjikā says : '
On the basis of the text published by Sastri in 1916 Shahidullah published his essay on Bauddha Gān O Dohā in the journal of the Bangiya Sahitya Parishad in 1920.7 In this article, he suggested several different renderings of his own. He wrote :
I have different interpretations to offer in rendering the Carya songs. They are primarily for three reasons. Firstly, there were scribal errors. Secondly, there are printing errors in the text. Thirdly, errors are committed due to similarities of letters. Had there been an original text these errors would have been averted. I had to work it out mainly on inferences and guesswork .
The article was appreciated by Chatterji and he mentioned U in his ODBL. He wrote :
The importance of the
Caryapadas has not been sufficiently appreciated in
The main thesis of Shahidullah was the study of the dohas where 'he had no occasion to pay special attention to the esoteric doctrines of the Caryas'.9 His thesis. Les Chants Mystiques de Kanha et de Saraha; Les Dohakosa et les Carya was the first full-length thorough study of the dohas of Kanha and Saraha. He edited Dohākoşa on the basis of Sastri's published text with the help of two Tibetan versions and published it in his book Les Chants Mystiques (Paris. 1928). He wrote :
'I edited the Dohakosa on the basis of Mahamahopadhyay Haraprasad Sastri's published text with the help of two Tibetan versions and published it in my book... with one Tibetan version and my French translation and notes.'10
His work aptly illustrated the importance of
employing Tibetan sources. In his Les Chants Mystiques, the Dohākoşas
were published in the original Apabhramśa together with the Tibetan translation.
There is a chapter devoted to the religious ideas of the Dohākoşa.
The following chapter deals with the authors of the Dohākoşa. The two
chapters contain the phonology and grammar and the prosody and metre." The
reviewer of the Bulletin of the
‘These texts are of equal
importance both for the history of later Buddhism in
In the appendix to his hook, Shahidullah re-edited the Caryas of Saraha and Kanha with their French translation. The following songs are treated : Kanha : Nos. 7. 9-13. 18. 19, 36, 40, 42, 45; Saraha : Nos. 22, 32, 38, 39. R.L. Turner wrote :
'The Bengali Caryas are given in an Appendix and their language is not studied. It is to be hoped that Mr. Shahidullah will return to them.'13
According to Chatterji,
the dohas present a dialect 'which is a kind of western (Śauraseni)
as its -u- nominatives, its -aha- genitives, its -ijja- passives and its
general agreement in forms with the literary Western Apabhramśa
amply indicate.'14 According to him, this dialect played the same rote, as the
Brajabhākhā did in later times, in relation to the Eastern languages.
However, Chatterji admitted that though it was a western dialect some Old
Bengali idioms and words had crept into it.15 Shahidullah made an intensive
study of these texts in his Les Chants Mystiques and tried to establish that
the language of these dohas is an
'He shows that the
Apabhramsa is not identical with that of
In phonology, Shahidullah noticed the preservation of palatal s. But the main phonological ground on which Shahidullah characterised this Apabhramśa as Eastern was "baseless' according to some scholars.17 Jules Bloch, in his Preface to the book of Shahidullah, is quite clear on this point.
'We may call it oriental because it is found in Eastern texts and because there are some Eastern influences but it is not so if we wish to find in it the base of the modern Eastern languages.'18
According to Prabodh Chandra Bagchi, the language of these dohās are considered as Western Apabhramśa, 'which was adopted by the Buddhist scholars of the Magadhan School for writing the texts'.19 Bagchi criticised the views of Shahidullah in his article on Caryagiti published in the journal of Visvabharati in 1945. According to him, an old manuscript of Dohakosa, found in the Nepal Darbar Library in 1929, conclusively proved that the language of the Dohakosa was 'Śaurasenī Apabhramśa. He wrote :
'According to Shahidullah,
the language of the Dohākoşas was Māgadhī Apabhramsas.
No evidence in support of his argument can be found in the new manuscripts of
Dohākoşas. During my last stay in
Although the number of songs concerned is limited, Les Chants Mystiques, never the less, made Caryagiti accessible in translation for the first time. Shahidullah assumed a number of suggestions of the texts of these songs but he did not discuss his grounds for making new emendations. He had not succeeded in bringing to light a corresponding translation of the Caryagiti, the discovery of which was left to Bagchi. Bagchi said :
'As the Mss. of the Dohas on which Haraprasad Sastri based his edition are now lost, Md. Shahidullah had to depend only on the Tibetan translation for making his emendations, which are valuable. But such emendations are helpful in making out the sense of the text but are not so useful for determining the forms of words.'21
Bagchi traced an old Ms. of the Dohākoşa in the collection of the exalted Rajaguru Hemaraja Sarma and another fragmentary Ms. of Dohākoşa in the Nepal Darbar Library in 1929. The former Ms. belonged to the thirteenth century and contained two collections—the Dohākoşa of Tillo, which is entirely new and the Dohākoşa of Saraha, which is an apt and comprehensive copy so far known. The fragmentary Ms. of the Darbar Library is the oldest Ms. (dated 1101 AD.) of any Dohākoşa hitherto known and contains fragments of two new Dohākoşas of Saraha and a portion of the Dohākoşa of Saraha already known. Bagchi informed thus :
'During my last stay in
Bagchi published the Dohākoşa with notes and translation in 1935. He wrote :
'Mahamahopadhyaya Haraprasad Sastri was the first to discover and publish the Buddhist Dohās... He published two collections of Dohās : one of Saraha and the other of Krsnācāryapāda. It was left to Dr. Shahidullah to handle the texts more critically. In an admirable work, Les Chants Mystiques de Kanha et de Saraha, he has compared the Apabhramśa verses with their Tibetan translation, settled their meaning and made a detailed study of their language.'23
While commenting on his own edition, Bagchi said :
'During my last stay in
Bagchi's edition, though incomplete, is clearly different from the study of Shahidullah. Bagchi wrote :
'I had the intention to make as much detailed study of the text as possible and to bring together all parallel texts available at this stage for elucidating the meaning. A new form of mysticism is contained in these texts and we cannot possibly interpret it without referring to other texts of the same school. The plan of my work is therefore different from that of Dr. Shahidullah and it is my intention to insist on these aspects which he has not treated.'25
Bagchi published the Tibetan translations of the songs along with a revised reading of the text in 1938. Both Shahidullah and Bagchi put more stress on the importance of Tibetan translation than on the Sanskrit commentary.
Shahidullah published the
entire original text in Bengali script in the Dacca Universities Studies in
1940 with a Bengali and an English translation and brief notes to the songs. He
edited the Āścaryaearyācaya under the title Buddhist Mystic
Songs with modern Bengali versions and translations in English and notes. The
Buddhist Mystic Songs was reprinted as a book by the Bengali Literary Society
of the Department of Bengali of the Karachi University in 1960, at the instance
of Syed Ali Ahsan, the then Head of the Department as it was included in the
syllabus of studies of the Universities of Dhaka, Rajshahi and Karachi. The
revised edition was published by the
‘I have established my text with the help of the following : 1) The printed text of Haraprasad Sastri, 2) A transcription of the original copy preserved in the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 3) The Sanskrit commentary, 4) The Tibetan version published by Bagchi, 5) Palaeography, 6) Philology, 7) Metre.
This edition was also
dedicated to the memory of Abu Raihan-al-Biruni and to the memory of his
revered teachers of
'Dr. Shahidullah is an
internationally reputed philologist and an authority on old Bengali. As a close
associate of Professor Sastri he worked in the
The study of Sukumar Sen, Old Bengali Texts, published in the Indian Linguistics (1944-1948), has the following parts : a) Index Verborum of Old Bengali Carya songs and fragments; b) The text in Bengali script — of Caryagiti and of a number of fragments and isolated verses from various sources; c) The English translation; d) A short essay discussing the nature, the dates, authorship, language, prosody and influence of Caryagiti; e) Notes on the Text. It was published in book-form in Bengali with an expanded introductory essay, entitled, Caryāgītipadābalī (1956).
Prabodhchandra Bagchi and Santi Bhiksu Sastri's book, Caryāgītikoşa of Buddhist Siddhas (1956) contained an edition of the text of Caryagiti and was published for the first time in Devanagari. A short preface summed up the contemporary state of research. It was followed by a re-edition of Bagchi's article 'Some Aspects of Buddhist Mysticism in the Caryāpadas'. Each song is accompanied by a Sanskrit Chaya, which is, on the whole, much clearer and more faithful to the original text than that of Bagchi in 'Materials for a Critical Edition of the Old Bengali Caryapadas'. The importance of this book consists primarily in providing a number of emendations to Munidatta as published in Bauddha Gan O Dohā. For the lack of new manuscripts, the only method was to utilise the Tibetan translation.
In his study Shahidullah referred to 'a number of editions of this mystic songs by different authors. On further studies I fell the necessity of re-editing the work. In this edition, 1 think, I have been able to give a better reading of the texts as explained in the notes while revising. I also fell the necessity of adding short biographical notes on the authors and of writing briefly about its grammar and metre.' 26
The Title of the Songs
The Ms. published by Sastri has no title. Sastri published the work under the caption Caryācaryaviniścaya (CV) which, however, was not found anywhere in the text. CV is the name of the Ms. that contains the Old Bengali songs called Caryagiti. The Ms. starts with the Sanskrit verse which contains the term Caryacaryaviniscaya. In his edition, Sastri, reversed the order by placing the Sanskrit verse after the Bengali song.
The authenticity of the name has been questioned. Some scholars believe that the term CV is an inadvertent error and therefore it should be emended.
Vidhusekhara Bhattacharya suggested the term Āścaryacaryācaya— which occurs in the opening Sanskrit verse of the Ms.—as the correct form of the title in a note published in the Bengali journal, Prabāsī.' 27 Bagchi agreed to his suggestion. He wrote :
‘In the opening verse of the Sanskrit commentary on the first Caryā attributed to Lūyipāda it is said : Śrīlūyecaraņādi siddharacitehapyaścaryaearya caye... Thus the name of the text which appears, in the Sanskrit verse as 'āśtaryacaryācaya' is also translated as the 'very wonderful carya songs'. It therefore seems that the name chosen by Dr. Sastri was based on a wrong reading of the title...' 28
According to Bagchi, the
Tibetan translation lends a hand in determining the exact name of the work- In
Bstan Hgyur the work is known under the title Caryyāgītikoşavrtti.
which contains the translation of both the Caryas and their Sanskrit
commentary, was compiled by Munidatta and translated by Kirticandra in the city
'The name preserved in Tibetan Caryāgītikoşavrtti refers to the commentary and thus Caryāgītikos”avr”tti might have been another name under which the collection of the Caryas was known.'29
Bagchi, however, recanted
his views in the article, Caryagiti, in 1945 and he supported the title,
Caryācaryaviniścaya, given by Sastri. The term carya is derived from
the root car-which means to go forward. The famous Upanisadic phrase Caraiveti means
'go forward'. Acara is thus codes of discipline that had men forward; carya is
putting into actual practice or acaranam whatever is gained or learnt by carca
and thus leading the life forward to its desired goal. Mere carca or acara is a
lower level human existence. It is mechanistic and touches the outer aspect of
things alone. Bagchi accepted the view of Manindra Kumar Basu, who published
his Caryāpada, from the
These songs were expressed by Bagchi as Caryāpadas. In the article, Caryāgīti, Bagchi was in favour of calling Caryāpadas as Caryāgīti. In support of his views, he wrote:
Shahidullah accepted the title Āśtaryacaryācaya. He wrote that 'what he [Sastri] called Caryācaryaviniścaya has been mentioned in its Sanskrit commentary as āścaryacaryācaya. We have adopted the latter name.'32 Shahidullah has stressed the word "ascarya' probably as one of the meanings of the word āścarya is 'mystic" and the word 'mystic' aptly describes the contents of the songs.
Tarapada Mukherjee, in his The Old Bengali Language and Text, wrote :
'Caryācaryaviniścaya, as a title of the text, however, gives a reasonably appropriate meaning. Any suggestion with regard to the emendation of the title, unless adequately substantiated, should therefore be rejected. Since Sastri appears to have been happy about the title, it seems reasonable to conclude that he must have found it in an authentic document.' 33
The Date of the Carya Songs
In the lists of Buddhist siddhas published by Grunwedel as well as in the commentary of Munidatta, the first siddha is stated to be Lui or Luyi. Lui is mentioned together with Dipankara-Srijnana (Atisa) [980-1056] as the co-author of Abhisarnaya-vibhanga, which would place him in the first half of the eleventh century.
In his Bengali Buddhist Literature, Sastri wrote :
'The discovery of a Bengali Buddhist Literature is an event of some importance in Literary History.... In the year 1879 appeared for the first time a history of Bengali Literature [Bangala Bhasa O Bangala Sahitya Bisayak Prastab, Part 1, published in July 15, 1872], written by an educated Pandit [Ramgati Nyayaratna], whose great admiration for Sanskrit Literature did not stand in the way of his appreciating what was then regarded as a lower form of Literature in the Vernaculars.... a Bengali Brahmin...was working patiently, quietly with the dusty heaps of palm leaf manuscripts in the Royal and private collections in the depth of the Himalayas, in the city of Kathmandu and in its neighbourhood... When he laid his hands, one fine morning, on a palm-leaf manuscript in the early twelfth century Bengali script, of a collection of Bengali songs with Sanskrit commentary attached.... It was Bengali on the face of it, much older Bengali hand-writing than that given in Professor Bendalf s photo etching at the end of his catalogue of Buddhist Manuscripts in the Cambridge University Library and belonging to the year 1198'.34
Sastri commented that the script belonged to the early twelfth century. The Sanskrit commentary must be earlier than that time. The collection of songs must precede the commentary and the composition of songs must precede the collection. According to him,
'... the songs belong to twenty different authors, whose signatures are invariably attached to the last lines of their songs. The authors therefore must belong to the tenth century at least.'
According to his opinion,
there were in ancient
'We may therefore take the period of Lui's literary activity in the last half of the tenth century A.D. and that of the sect founded by him between 950 to 1100 A.D.' 35
In his ODBL, Chatterji said that this period provisionally may be regarded as the upper limit for the Caryas. He wrote :
‘The date of one of these Siddha-composers of the poem, Lui or Luyipada, seems to be certain : he was an elder contemporary of Dipankara-Śrijnāna or Atīśa and they prepared a Buddhist Tantrika work named Abhisamayavibhanga.... The literary life of Lui, when he composed these songs, can very well be placed in the second half of the 10th century.'36
Shahidullah was quite different in opinion from that of Sastri. In his Bānglā Sāhityer Kathā, he wrote :
On the other hand, certain scholars have ascribed to him a much earlier date. Shahidullah in his Buddhist Mystic Songs wrote :
'The time of Luyi can be
ascertained by the date of his guru
According to Rahul Samkrtyayana, Lūyipā was the Kāyastha or writer of king Dharmapāla (770-810 A.D.)39
The same chronological confusion is characteristic of the other siddhās as well. Kŗşņa was a common name and the various persons who bore it are not distinguished. To identify the particular Kŗşņa with any certainty seems impossible. An attempt was made by Shahidullah. Jālandharī is referred to with respect in one of the songs (No. 36). Assured of this connection, Shahidullah associates this Kŗşņa with the one referred to by Taranath, where Jalandhari and Kŗşņa appear as contemporaries of the king Govicandra, who, again according to Taranath, was a contemporary of Dharmakirti. On the basis of this and still less certain evidence he places Kŗşņa about 700 A.D.. Snellgrove in a critical study clearly pointed out that 'the master of Jalandhari is Indrabhuti llnot Indrabhuti 1, a distinction Shahidullah fails to make when he refers to this passage. It would upset his calculations by at least 100 years. The last two kings of the Candra dynasfy were Gobindacandra and Layahacandra and are assigned to the first half of the eleventh century. This dating still further demolishes the evidence which Shahidullah adduces to substantiate the existence of his Kŗşņa in 700 A.D.'40
While reviewing his Les
Chants Mystics in the Bulletin of the
‘Mr. Shahidullah places Kanha in the eighth century and Saraha in the eleventh. As both have written in both Apabhramsa and Bengali, if the author is right, the caryas of Kanha are the oldest documents of any modern IA language. One must, however, suspect that the language has been considerably modernised in the course of tradition; but the author has established his text with careful consideration of the metre and with reference to the Tibetan versions, which he prints here.' 41
No definite date can be assigned to the Caryas. The majority of the authorities agree in that the songs cannot be of later origin than the twelfth century A.D. . The twelfth century is generally believed to be the date of the Ms. and the eleventh century— between 950 A.D. and 1100 A.D. to be more precise — as the probable date of composition of the songs. Sen places the songs between the eleventh and twelfth centuries.
'No definite date can be assigned to the songs. The lower limit, however, is 1200 and the upper limit cannot be much later than 1050.'35
On the other hand, Shahidullah and Samkrtyayana put the lower limit back to the eighth century. However, the date suggested by Shahidullah has not gained universal support. In his Bāngālā Sāhityer Kathā (Part 1) Shahidullah wrote :
The time of Matsyendranath may be inferred sometimes in the middle of the seventh century. This is the period when Bengali literature had its origin. The Bengali language developed at least hundred years earlier. The language of the Buddhist songs was in Old Bengali. Among the writers the oldest one was Sabaripa and the most modern one was Sarahapada or Bhusuka (eleventh century). Ascaryacaryacaya was written in sometimes between 650 and 1100 A.D.
The oldest text in Maithili which we have is the Varņa-ratnākara of Jyotirīśwara Thakura, who wrote it during the first quarter of the fourteenth century. He has mentioned the names of some of the Bengali authors in the list of eighty-four Siddhās. It throws light on the dates of the Siddhācāryas. Sukumar Sen, in his Bāngāla Sāhityer Itihās (Part 1), rightly summarised these as follows :
According to Suniti Kumar Chatterji and Prabodhchandra Bagchi, Siddhacaryas belonged to a period in between tenth and twelfth centuries. Shahidullah placed them more than two or three hundred years back. The views expressed by Chatterji appear to be more acceptable. Historically it can be proved that the appearance of Siddhācāryas can be fourteenth century latest and eleventh century earliest. Maithili poet, Jyotirīśvara Thakur in his Varņaratnākara, have mentioned the names of some Bengali Siddhācāryas.
The Language of the Carya Songs
When Sastri published the text of Caryagiti in 1916, he characterised the language in which the songs were written as Old Bengali. Suniti Kumar Chatterji confirmed this in 1926 from the linguistic point of view and later Bengali scholars who have dealt with Caryagiti have arrived at the same conclusion. These songs are, as Sen says, 'written in Old Bengali when the language was just evolving out of Laukika or Avahattha, the proto vernacular stage of Apabhramśa. The language of the songs naturally shows some features that are distinctly Laukika, and others that are common to the eastern and Western New Indo-Aryan speeches at their earliest stage, but there is no doubt regarding the essential Bengali stamp on its grammar, idiom and syntax.'45
As is well-known, various languages have staked their claims on the Caryapadas, but such a discussion, though possible, would be of no use, whatever its result would be.
Bijay Chandra Majumdar, in his History of the Bengali Language (1920), initiated a discussion on the language of the Carya-songs. He wrote:
'Looking to the metrical system and the grammatical forms some verses may be declared to be composed in Hindi. Generally the language of many effusions is such a jumble of various words and grammatical forms of various provinces and of various times, that we hardly say, that the writings represent any particular dialect... Though the language is mainly Hindi, the authors allowed words and forms of many dialects to flow freely into their composition'.46
In the book The Formation of the Maithili Language (1958), S. Jha argued that the language of Caryagiti exhibits a number of traits which are characteristics of Maithili rather than Old Bengali. Chatterji also suggested that 'it is not strange to find in the Carya Ms. two Maithili forms bhanathi and bolathi (=Old and Early Middle Bengali bhananti, bolanti) and one or two cases of use of-a- instead of-i- as the link vowel in the -b- forms of the verb’. 47
Rahul Samkrtyayana has
advocated Hindi's claim in his book on Buddhism in
‘In his History of Oriya Literature (1962), Mayadhara Mansinha argued that the language is Oriya. 'Scores of words used in these poems, historic associations, the general milieu and the continuity of the spirit of the poems through literary traditions down to the modern times, all declare in no unmistaken terms that quite a good number of these poems were composed in Orissa, if not in Oriya, as Oriya as such did not exist at that time, any more than Bengali or Assamese.'49
In his Caryāgītipadābalī", Sen commented :
Everyone claims that the language of the Buddhist songs is not Bengali but Hindi or Maithili or Oriya. The claims of the Assamese language cannot be denied. There was hardly any difference between Assamese and Bengali till the sixteenth century. It cannot be overlooked that there was much similarity among the Early New Indo-Aryan languages. At the early stage it was very difficult to detect the difference of one language from the other.
Suniti Kumar Chatterji in The People, Language and Culture of Orissa (1966) pointed out clearly from the scientific point of view that 'the language of the Caryapadas is the oldest specimen of a speech which comes nearest to what may be described as Old Oriya and Old Assamese, although the specific Bengali character in the grammar and forms and in the general atmosphere of the literature itself, has got to be noted.'51 He commented that
'... the better plan would be to have first of all authoritative text of the Caryas (with similar other literature) prepared, and that can be the work only of a single scholar, as it would be difficult to muster the linguistic talent from all the Magadhan languages for an investigation of the literary and linguistic as well as the philosophical and religious problems involved in the proper study of the Caryapadas. When this is done, and there is a general agreement about the text as established with the help of the linguistic science, then this matter of the exact linguistic affinity and affiliation of the Caryapadas can be fully discussed and finally decided. For the present, it can of course be said that Bengali, Assamese and Oriya each was a thousand years ago something like what we find in the Caryapadas, taking note also of the later developments in each language in phonology, in morphology and in vocabulary.' 52
Shahidullah tried to put an end to the controversies on the question of the language in his article Bauddha Gāner Bhāşā. He wrote :
Technically it should not be called the language of the Buddhist songs. It may be called the language of Luyipada, the language of Kanhapada, etc.. From the linguistic point of view it can be ascertained that the language of Aryadeva was Oriya, the language of Santipada was Maithili, the language of Kanha-Saraha-Bhusuka was Old Bengali or Banga-Kamarupi. It may be linguistially wrong to call these songs artificial or mixed.
Chatterji suggested that the 'language of the Caryas seems to be based on West Bengali dialect'. However, Shahidullah differed on this point when he stated that :
According to Suniti Kumar
Chatterji, the language of the Dohakosas is based on the language of
According to Sukumar Sen.
"the language of the Caryā songs is basically vernacular, but at the
same time it is also something of a literary language. The main dialect seems
to have been that of
A Caryā song invariably contains the name of the author and often also the name of his guru. Twenty-eight songs out of total of 46 contain 'bhaņitā', i.e., a final line in which the author mentions his own name (from the Ö bhan- 'to say'). Of these twenty-eight songs, five should be rejected because they contain in the bhanita honorific forms, i.e.. bhananti, etc. These songs may have been composed by their disciples who inserted the names of their teachers as the authors of the songs as a mark of respect. From the bhanitas that appear in the songs we know that the collection represents twenty-three authors. A higher number of Caryas bears the names of Kanha and Bhusuka, less those of Saraha, Luyi, Kukkuripada and Santi. In the remaining cases, only one song appears under each name.
According to Sastri, the songs belong to twenty different authors, all called Siddhacaryas. Of these Lui is called the Adi Siddhacarya. Darik, another Siddhacarya. says that it is through the grace of Lui that he has attained the twelfth stage of progress and has now become fully equal to Buddha. Darik seems therefore to be an immediate disciple of Lui. Krsnacarya is also a Siddhacarya. Sastri wrote :
'From his language he appears to have been a Bengali. He ises such peculiarly Bengali words chinali, jautuka, tala, bol bob for boba dumb, kāl for kala deaf, bhali for bhala, dehu for deo, mali for mala garland. Four of his descendants are long the authors of these songs, namely, Saroruha or Saraha, Dharma or Dharmapada, Dhendhana or Dhetana and Mahipada. Kambala or Kamali is one of the authors and Kankana is one of his descendants. Virupa or Virua is one of the Siddhacaryas and Vinapada is his descendant. So it is clear that these belong to several, at least, to two generations'.55
According to Sastri, Lui was an inhabitant of Radha 'where he is still worshipped by the followers of Dharma who often dedicate a he-goat to Lui and it is a sin to kill the goat so dedicated and in that portion of the Mayurabhanja state which is still called Radha he is still worshipped as a saint.' 56 He was very fond of eating the entrails of the fish and therefore he had a nickname Matsantrada or the eater of the entrails of the fish and the cataloguist of the Tangur remarks that he should be distinguished from Matsyendranath, the son of Minanath, the founder of the Saiva Yogi sect.
In his Les Chants Mystique there is a chapter which deals with the authors of the Dohakosa. The revised edition of his Buddhist Mystic Songs deals briefly with the biographical data of the authors. In this book, he gave 'short accounts of these poets as they serially occur in the text, without any chronological order which is only suppositionaf .
The Grammar of the Mystic Songs
His discussion on the grammar of the Old Bengali songs is divided into three main parts : Nominal System, Pronominal System and Verbal System. In the nominal system, Shahidullah highlighted only the treatment of case-affixes. The inflections denoting cases are added directly to the noun stem.
Nominative Case — generally without affix : bhanai Kankana (Kankana - 44); Kamala bikasiu (Bhusuku - 27); etc..
Nominative — with affix -e : Kumbhire khai (Kukku -ri 2); bhanathi Kukkuripāe, etc..
Nominative — with -e” : bhāde bhanai (Bhadra 35); ājadebe saala bihaliu (Aryadeva 31), etc..
Accusative — generally without affix : guru puchia jāna (Lui 1); māri sāsu nananda (Kanha 11) etc..
Accusative — with affix -e ; Sahaje Kahei (Bhusuku 27), Sāthi Kariba Jālandharipāe (Kanha 36), etc..
Accusative — with -ẽ : gaabarẽ toliā (Kanha 12); duhkhẽ? sukhẽ eku Kariyā (Darik 34) etc..
Accusative — with -ka : matiẽ thākuraka parinibittā (Kanha 12); etc..
Accusative — with -ke : kẽ" ki bāhabake pārai. (Kambalārnbara 8);
Accusative — with -ku : Vidyā Karikũ Dama (Kanha 9);
Accusative — with -re, -ere : Keho tohore biruā bolai (Kanha 18); Kahere Kisa bhani (Lui 29);
Accusative — with -rẽ Karinā Karinirẽ risai (Kanha 9);
Instrumental — with affix -ẽ : begẽ" (Catilla 5); māsẽf (Bhusuku 6); lilẽ (dO 27); Kuthārẽ (Kanha 45) etc..
Instrumental — with -e : Sone (Kambalambara 8); āpane (Saraha 22);
Instrumental — with -tẽ -etẽ : dukhetẽ (Lui 1), tarangatẽ" (Bhusuku 6), biārete (Santi 15) etc..
Dative — with affixes -e, -ka, -kũ : bibāhe caliā (Kanha 19) nāsaka thā to (Bhusuku 21), makũ nathā (Bhadra 35);
Ablative — with affixes -hi, -hu, -hũ, -ta : Kauhi dara bhāi (Kukkuri 2); raanahu sahaje kahei (Bhusuku 27); khepahũ joini lepana jāi (Gundari 4);
Possessive — with affixes -ra, -era, -re, -rā : dombiera sange (Kanha 19); badira pase (Sabara 30); basana tora (Bhusuku 19);
Affixes -ri, -ri, -eri,
-eri with the feminine possessed : haderi
With affixes — ka, -ke : chāndaka bāndha (Lui 1);
Locative — with affixes -e, -e, -ye, -i : cancala cie paithā kāla (Lui 1); Sāsu gharẽ ghāli koñcā tāla (Gundari 4);
With affixes — hi, -hi : mo hiahi na paisai (Kanha 7)
With affix -ta — Sānkamata cadilc dāhina bāma mā hohi (Cātilla 5),
Omission of the affix — pidhā dharana na jai (Kukkuri 2); suna baha tathatā pahāri (Kanha 36);
Vocative — Saraha bhanai bapā ujub”ta bhāila (Saraha 32); nagara bahiri re dombi tohori kudiā (Kanha 10), etc..
Pronominal System — Shahidullah gave the forms of the first, second and third personal pronouns, which occur in the Old Bengali songs, in his Buddhist Mystic Songs and History of Bengali Literature (Part 1).
First Person Second Person Third Person
Singular : Plural Singular : Plural Singular : Plural
Nom. haũ, hāu : ”amhe tu, to : tumhe so : te
Acc. mo : āmhe to, torẽ : tumhe ta : te
Instr mai, moe : āmhe tai, toe : tumhe, tohorẽ se : te
Dat. mo : āmhe to : tohorẽ x : x
Abl. x : x x : x x : x
Gen. mor : mohor tor : tohor taher : tasu
Loc. x : x x : x tahĩ : tasu
Verbal System : There are two categories of verbs in Old Bengali, finite and non-finite, of which the finite contains root, inflections denoting tense. In the present tense there are two numbers : singular and plural. In the past and future all numbers and persons are the same. Only two moods are found in Old Bengali — indicative and imperative. In his Buddhist Mystic Songs and History of Bengali Literature (Part1), Shahidullah gave specimen conjugational pattern of the root cal- :
Present Tense / Indicative Mood
First Person calami, calama calahũ
Second Person calasi calaha
Third Person calai calanti, (calathi)
Second Person cala, calihasi Calaha, caliha,
[ jāhi, hohi ] [ karahu, lehu ]
Third Person Calau (calantu)
Past tense Future tense
Participles are formed from roots of all classes. They pertake of the nature of adjectives. The following examples are quoted by Shahidullah : participles with -ante as padantẽ" (Dombi 14); jāante ( śānti 15); participles with -ile, as cadile (catilla 5, Kambalambara 8), bhaile (Kukkuri 2).
The linguistic study of
grammar is conventionally divided into two parts : morphology — the study of
word structure and syntax — the study of sentence structure. In this study
Shahidullah put forward a detailed analysis of a few sentences of the Old
Bengali songs. Some of the principal rules of syntax, as explained by
Shahidullah, are stated below : 1. The possessive case as in Hindi follows the
gender of the noun possessed, e.g. hadiri
The Carya songs show two metrical types. In his Buddhist Mystic Songs, Shahidullah mentioned that majority of the songs is in the pādākulaka metre in which each hemistich contains 16 morae. According to his edition, the following songs are in this metre : Nos. 1-9, 11-13, 17-22, 26-27, 29-33, 35-38, 40. 42. 45, 47, 49.
The first song may be scanned thus :
Kāā tarubara pāncabi dāla |
Cancala cie paithā kāla ||
Dida kari a mahā suha pari nāma |
Lui bha ņai guru puchia jāna ||
He explained thai "this metre is equivalent to the Bengali rhyme where, however, the metre is syllabic :
' brsti pade tapur tupur nadi elo ban
sib thakurer biye halo tin kanye dan ||
Shahidullah, in his History of Bengali Literature, compared many varieties of the Buddhist mystic songs with ŚrīKŗşņa kīttana.
sisata sobhae tora kāmasindura |
Kalāte tilaka yenha naba sasikalā |
kundala mandita cam srabanayugalā ||
Some songs are in the tripadī metre 8+8+12 morale. According to his edition, the following songs are in this metre, viz., Nos. 10, 14-16, 23, 28, 34, 39. 41. 43, 50.
Song No. 14 : bāhatu dombi | baha lo dombi | bātala bhaila uchārā
Song No. 15 : āge
nāba na | bheli disai | bhanti na puchasi
This corresponds to Jayadeva's song in the Gita-gobinda as
ratisukhasāre | gatamabhisāre | madanamanoharabes'am |
Shahidullah compared it with Srikrsnakirttana :
je dāle karo mo bhare se dala bhanginā pade
nāhi hena dāla yāta karõ bisarāme |
āni deha yabẽ kānhe bhidi deu ālingane
tāk nā tejibo are jarame ||
There are other varieties of tripadī such as 8+8+4 morae, e.g.
Song Nos. 10. 43: 8+8+8 morac, e.g. Song Nos. 39, 50.
Song No. 10 : nagara bahiri re | dombi tohori kudiyā
Song No. 43 : Sahaja mahataru | phariā e te- | loe
Song No. 39 : suineha abidara | are nia mana to— | hore dose
Song No. 50 : gaanala gaanata | tailā badī | hiẽ kurādī ||
Shahidullah compared with Srikrsnakirttana,
mayura puche bandhi cudā kesa pase dia bedhā
kanayā kusume bandhi jatā |
deha nĩla megha chadha gandha candaner phota
yena uye gaganc cānda gotā ||
Shahidullah compared the metre of the following two Carya songs with those of Jayadeva.
Song No. 44 : sune suna miliā jabẽ |
saala dhāma uiā tabẽ ||
Song No. 46 : pekhu suine adas'a jaisā |
antarale hhababi taisā ||
Gitagobinda : anita-tarala kubalayanayanena |
tapati na sā kisalayasayanena ||
Srikrsnakirtlana : pakila dadi mathar kes' |
bāman sarir makad bes ||
Shahidullah devoted much
of his time on this subject. The journal of the Bangiya Sahitya Parishad—the
Sahitya Parishad Patrika—brought out some of his valuable articles, viz.,
Bauddha Gān O Dohā (1920), Bhusuku (1941), Bauddha Gān U
Alocanā (1941), Siddhā Kānupār Dohā O Tahar Anubad
(1942) etc. Some of his tracts on these were written in—the Pratibha. viz,
Siddhā Kānupār Gīt O Dohā (1921), Kānupār
(1921), Siddhā Kānupā (1923), Siddhā Kānupār
Gīter Bhāşā (1925), etc. Some of his essays were published
in the Sahitya Patrika—a bi-annual Bulletin of the Bengali Department of the
His Bānglā Sāhitycr Kathā (Vol. 1 : Old Period) (History of Bengali Literature) was a collection of essays. These essays were written in different times. Therefore divergent views are noticed even in the same topic. He wrote :
‘The lyricists (Matsyendranath, Goraksanath, Luipa, Kambalambara, Kukkuripa, Sabaripa, Jalandharipa, etc.) can be placed in the second half of the seventh century'.
Elsewhere but in the same book he wrote :
'Luipa may be generally placed in between 730 and 810 A.D.' ‘Sabaripa may be generally placed in between 680 and 760 A.D.;
Shahidullah proposes many emendations of the original text. Very often, however, it is merely a question of substituting a more regular orthography which, in absence of new Mss., rarely serve little purpose. His notes contain full of suggestions but are extremely brief and leave very many problems unsolved.
1 Hājār Bacharer Purāņa Bāngālā Bhāşāy Bauddha Gān O Dohā : Haraprasad Sastri, First Edition. Introduction p. 4
2 The Old Bengali Language and Text : Tarapada Mukherjee,
3 Op.cit, p 4.
4 The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language : S.K. Chatterji, p.122
5 Comparative Grammar of Middle Indo-Aryan : Sukumar Sen
Linguistic Society of
6 Proto-New Indo-Aryan : Subhadra Kumar Sen,
7 Bauddha Gān O Dohā :
8 ODBL : Op.cil, p. 118.
9 Some Aspects of Buddhist Mysticism in the Caryapadas :
Studies in the Tantras : P. C. Bagehi, Part 1,
10 The Dohākoşa of Saraha :
11 Caryāgītikā : Syed Ali Ahsan,
12 Bulletin of the
14 ODBL : Op.cit, p. 112.
16 BSOS. Vol. 7. 1933-1935.
17 The Sibilants in the Buddhist Dohas : P. C. Bagchi, Indian Linguistics Vol.V. Pan IV. 1935.
20 Caryāgīti : P. C. Bagchi, Visvabharati Patrika, No. 2 1352.
21 The Sibilants in the Buddhist Dohas : P. C. Bagchi, Op.cit.
22-25 Dohakosa : P. C. Bagchi; Journal of the
Department of Letters,
26 Buddhist Mystic Songs :
27 Is it Caryācaryaviniścaya or Āścarya caryācaya? : Vidhusekhar Bhattacharya; IHQ Vol. VI (1930) p. 169-171.
28 Some Aspects of Buddhist Mysticism in the Caryapadas : P. C.
Bagchi, Studies in the Tantras (Part 1), University of
30-31 Prabandha Samgraha : P. C. Bagchi, Pascim Banga Bangla Akademi, 2001, p.1-13.
32 Buddhist Mystic Songs : Shahidullah, Preface.
33 The Old Bengali Language and Text : Op.cit., p. 4.
34-35 Bengali Buddhist Literature : H. P. Sastri,
36 O.D.B.I.. : S. K. Chatterji, Op.cit, p. 119-120.
37 Bangla Sahityer Katha : Shahidullah (Part 1) : Racanabali, Vol. 2, p..43.
38 Buddhist Mystic Songs : Op.cit., p. 589.
40 The Hevajra Tantra : A Critical Study, D. L. Snellgrove,
41 BSOS Vol. 7, 1933-1935.
42 History of Bengali Literature : Sukumar Sen, Sahitya
43 Bāngālā Sāhityer Kathā (Vol. 1) :
Old Period :
44 Bangala Sahityer Itihas : Sukumar Sen, Vol. 1, Ananda Publishers, 195, pp. 54-55.
45 History of Bengali Literature : Sukumar Sen, Op.cit., p. 27.
46 History of the Bengali Language : Bijay Chandra Majumdar,
47 The Formation Of the Maithili Language : S. Jha,
48 Some Aspects of Buddhist Mysticism in the Caryapadas :
Studies in the Tantras (I'art I) : P. C. Bagchi, University of
49 History of Oriya Literature : Mayadhar Mansinha,
50 Caryāgīti Padābalī: Sukumar Sen, 1966, p. 47.
51-52 The People, Language and Culture of Orissa :
S. R. Chatterji, Orissa Sahitya Akademi.
53 Bauddha Gāher Bhāşā :
55 Bengali Buddhist Literature : H. P. Sastri,
The Greek philosophers first turned their attention to grammar in the fifth century B.C. The Indian grammatical tradition predates the Greek, but was not known in the West until the eighteenth century. By that time the Greek tradition, though modified over the ages, had been entrenched for over 2000 years, exerting an inexorable influence over the description of diverse languages and supplying the framework for teaching grammar, whether in connection with classical or modem foreign languages or the mother tongue. The Greek model spread beyond its immediate domain when borrowed by the Romans for application to Latin. The structure of Classical Greek and Latin being related, the fit between the Greek model and Latin was perhaps not too uncomfortable. Later, Latin grammar was investigated independently of that of Greek, and this led to descriptive refinement. Yet the foundations remained Greek, so that in some sense Latin was taught on the basis of Greek grammar. Again, this might not have been altogether injurious, but when the teaching of modern languages entered the curriculum, those leaching them, being imbued in the classical languages, also attempted to squeeze them into the Gracco-Roman mould, this time creating a less comfortable fit.
The chief event in
In the Introduction to his Dictionary, Vocabulario em Idioma Bengalla e Portuguez, Manoel da Assumpcam referred to certain rules on Bengali grammar. His rules on language was the first to attempt at an analysis of the Bengali language. Assumpcam is known as the first grammarian of the Bengali language. And his work was the first book on Bengali grammar. However, Assumpcam had never written any book under the title Bengali grammar. The title of his work is Portuguese-Bengali Dictionary. The introductory part in every dictionary contains some grammatical notes. The dictionaries of Forster (1799-1802), Carey (1825), Haughton (1825) contain some notes on grammar. Assumpcam’s grammar, likewise, contains those notes only on Bengali grammar that were relevant to his work on dictionary.
Suniti Kumar Chatterji
took a great interest in the discovery and assessment of this grammar. He
utilised it in his ODBL in considering the earlier pronunciation of Bengali.
Bengali Grammar of Manoel da Assumpcam, edited and translated by Chatterji and
Priya Ranjan Sen, was published from
The grammar consists of two parts : a morphological section and a syntactical section. The morphological section deals with the declension of nouns, pronouns and adjectives and the conjugation of verbs. Little is said of phonology. In addition to so many direct references to Latin, there is a profuse use of Latin words also. Chatterji noted that Manoel had composed his grammar on the framework of Latin grammar. The Bengali sentences in this book are described by Chatterji as 'grotesque'
second inline, Nathaniel Brassey Halhed (1751-1830) was pioneer in the field.
His Bengali grammar—the first printed book in
' Phiringinām upakārārtham kriyate Halhed āngreji’.
The credit of designing and casting Bengali types and of printing the book where the Bengali types were first used goes to Charles Wilkins, an employee in the East India Company. Halhed and Wilkins had no locally produced printed book which could serve as a model. So that they had to model the grammar on the contemporary books primed in Europe4.
Halhed was a good scholar
and his knowledge of the Bengali language and literature was deep and intimate.
He was the first European to identify the Bengali language correctly. 1 le was
the first to explain that, Bengali, even though a distinct language, was closely
related to Sanskrit—"the grand source of Indian literature, the parent of
every dialect from the Persian gulf to the
William Carey, an
eighteenth century English Baptist missionary to
'I have made some distinctions and observations not noticed by him, particularly on the declension of nouns and verbs, and the use of panicles.’8
The contents of his grammar are :
Chapter I: Letters. Chapter A: Substantives,
Chapter II: Adjectives. Pronouns.
Chapter III : Verbs,
Chapter IV : Adverbs.
Chapter V : Prepositions. Conjunctions,
Chapter VI : Interjections.
Chapter VII : Compound words. Syntax, Contractions.
Chapter VIII : Numbers, Money, Weight, Long measure, Dry measures. His grammar was the only important work in the field of linguistic description of Bengali till the publication of Rammohan's work.
Mrityunjay Vidyalankar (1762-1819), eminent scholar of Sanskrit, was the most significant writer of Bengali prose in its early phase of growth. In his Bengali grammar, written probably in between 1807 and 1811, he experimented with various styles ranging from highly Sanskritic to intimate as well as colloquial. In its introduction, the editor, Tarapada Mukherjee, wrote :
Rammohan Roy, 'the first
great thought leader of
'Some of these gentlemen (European philanthropists in Bengal) with a view to facilitate intercourse between themselves and the natives, have undergone much labour in acquiring a thorough knowledge of the vernacular language of the country ; while others are diligently seeking access to it, without any expectation of deriving useful information or rational entertainment from any work in the language. This tract, being composed with a view to convey the principal rules applicable to that tongue and a brief outline of the general principles of Grammar, is intended as a humble present for those worthy persons....9
He felt the absence of Bengali grammar in the language for a longtime. The Sambād Kaumudī in its issue number7 (first published in December, 1821) duly emphasised the importance of studying Bengali grammar in the mother-tongue for the Bengali students. In response to the Seventh Report of the School Book Society [For the purpose of supplying easier, shorter and cheaper text books the School Book Society was established in Calcutta in 1817], Rammohan had undertaken the work of Bengali rendering of his English edition of the grammar. It stated
'the conviction that Bengali Grammar, better adopted to the instruction of native youths that the one on their list, has led your committee to solicit the services of Baboo Rammohun Roy in preparing one ; they are happy to report that this gentleman has cheerfully engaged to give his immediate attention to the execution of his work.10"
He had followed his English grammar mostly in composition of the Gaudīya Vyākaraņa, published shortly after his death in 1833. His Bengali showed no literary flourish and was simple, direct and expressive. In his grammar, he stressed on the basic characteristics and nature of the Bengali language. Though Halhed and Carey pointed out the independent status of Bengali, they stressed the domination of Sanskrit over Bengali. Rammohan Ray was the first grammarian who declared emphatically that Bengali is a language independent of Sanskrit and its grammar should be written with this fact clearly in mind. He coined grammatical terms also wherever necessary. Hence the publication of his grammar was significant, if not epoch-making. Pramatha Chowdhury (1868-1948), who took the lead in the adoption of the standard colloquial in place of the highly Sanskraised sādhubhāşā for all literary purposes through his journal, the Sabujpatra. commented on his grammar that
'Though a touch of rare genius is revealed in every page of the book—Gaudīya Bhāşā Vyākaraņa—it fails to cater the needs of the general students. It is just the primar to a language. Besides, the terminologies used by him are not familiar to the present Bengalis.'
It was recommended as the
prescribed text in many Bengali medium schools, at the Tattvabodhini Pāthśālā
and at the Bengali classes of the
'A historical grammar of Bengali in the true sense of the term there has never been in Bengali ; and there has not been a work exclusively on Bengali by any European scholar, on the lines of Trumpp's Sindhi Grammar or Kellogg's 1 Hindi Grammar or C. J. Lyalf s Sketch of Hindustani, to guide the Bengali scholar in acquiring a true perspective which the too near presence of Sanskrit and the fact of the language being his mother-tongue generally blur for him. But there have at times been refreshing manifestations of common sense in writing grammars of Bengali. The first Bengali to write a grammar of his mother-tongue was the Father of Modern India, the great Raja Ram Mohun Roy, whose work was published in English in 1826 and in Bengali in 1833 ; and he knew what we should mean by 'Bengali'13.
This is the best Bengali grammar that is yet to be written and in some respects it has not been surpassed yet.
The grammars of Syama Charan Sarkar (1814-1882), written in English and Bengali were different, as he was eager to present the structure of colloquial Bengali beside that of sadhubhāşā. In his introduction, Sarkar wrote :
'A mere superficial and guess-work knowledge of the language used in books and other compositions, cannot answer every purpose of communication, for the idioms and phraseologies of conversation are somewhat different from the written language and not generally to be found in books; and thus it is that some of our Sahibs, though good Bengali scholars, arc exposed to remarks and even redicule by speaking the language just as they find it written.'14
He said about the grammar of Rammohan that
The Grammar written by Raja Ram Mohun Roy, the pride of our country, is good as regards every topic which it discusses, but it contains no rules for the correct use of the pure Sanskrit words and others of foreign origin which are used in Bengalee. Neither does it give any directions for colloquial phraseology.'15
Sarkar mentioned the shortcomings of the grammar. He commented that
'The language itself indeed is rich, but the works treating of that language are poor and few.'16
John Beames' Grammar of the Bengali Language, published in 1891, was the first book of its kind which attempted to deal, not only with the inflated language of modern Bengali literature but also with the altogether different spoken tongue17. It had five chapters. Chapter I ; The Alphabet, Chapter II : The Noun, Chapter III : The Pronoun, Chapter IV : The Verb and Chapter V : The Particles + Index. The new and enlarged edition, published in 1894, had seven chapters of which the sixth chapter was on Bengali grammar and the last chapter dealt with the Specimens of Bengali Literature + Notes to the Specimens of Bengali Literature + Index. He wrote the aim of his grammar in its preface :
'I have especially aimed
at making the work useful to those who desire to understand the spoken language
His grammar was based on the Bengali grammar of Syamacaran Sarkar. In his Comparative Grammar of the Modern Aryan Languages of India, he wrote ‘Yates’ Bengali Grammar initiates the students into all the mysteries of Sandhi as though they were still in use, and his distress, when he is obliged to give a genuine vernacular form instead of some skilled Sanskritism, is quite ludicrous.’ He also said that 'it is necessary to specify the dictionaries and grammars of the modern vernaculars. They are those in ordinary use, and for the most part very bad and defective, except...Shamacharan Sarkar's very complete and useful Bengali Grammar.' J. D. Anderson wrote about his grammar that 'Mr. Beames' Grammar was based upon the Bengali grammar (now out of print) of that once famous teacher, the late Syama Charan Sarkar. Mr. Beames had the help of Babu Priyanath Bhattacharya.'19 Hirendranath Datta (1868-1942),an active member of the Bengal Academy of Literature (later known as Bangiya Sahitya Parishad) wrote in a letter that
'Great credit is due to Mr. Beames that he has succeeded with such exactness to discriminate the sounds of Bengali letters......’20
The Journal of Royal Asiatic Society wrote '.......Mr. Beames' example shows that foreigners can render good service by calling attention to matters which escape the notice of natives from sheer familiarity'. In 1885 Tagore's criticism of Beames' account of the pronunciation of Bengali was published in the Bhāratī 22. He said that the Bengalis are deplorably careless of the phonetics of their native speech.
There are many matters connected with the Bengali alphabet which require careful examination. Although Bengali pronunciation has strayed very far from its Sanskrit original, the alphabet is still far more nearly phonetic than European alphabets. Tagore was the first scholar to admit it. In the article, Mr. Rabindranath Tagore's Notes on Bengali Grammar. J.D. Anderson wrote :
'This chapter relates almost entirely to questions of pronunciation, and these are notoriously difficult to discuss in writing. The differences between Mr. Beames and his critic are sometimes, I think. partly due to this difficulty......On Mr. Tagore's own showing, Mr. Beames has emerged not unsuccessfully from the close, if kindly, trial to which his critic has submitted him.24
In his review, Tagore
recognised the importance that in the phonetics, grammar and etymology of
Indian languages is a field of inquiry in which Indians and Europeans can be of
use to one another. The European brings to the study some experience of
comparative methods, some knowledge of the new means of recording phonetic
facts now in use in
‘...In respect of grammar, written Bengali differs from spoken Bengali far more than is perhaps the case with any other living human language.....some of the inflections of nouns and pronouns, the conjugations of verbs and the distinction of gender in nouns and adjectives, furnish very important points of difference between spoken Bengali and written. Several of these differences are to be traced to the influence of Sanskrit and have been in part but recent innovations in a backward direction: while the others are archaic forms kept up in writing after they have dropped out of use in the spoken tongue.'
Haraprasad Sastri first triggered off in 1901-1902 the debate when he read out an article Bānglā Byākaraņ at the Bangiya Sahitya Parishad from which it spread over the pages of contemporary periodicals. Sastri observed
'A little less than two hundred and fifty Bengali grammars have been written so far .... A Bengali has no reason to gloat over this mass of grammars, because two kinds of men arc preparing them by two kinds of patents ; a class among them is that of the author-pundits who follow the Mugdha-bodha-patent; another consists of teachers who follow the Hiley patent’.
[There were grammars that
were written after an English model, reportedly that of Richard Hiley, whose
English Grammar was widely used in the schools of nineteenth century
The dispute brought about two mutually irreconcilable groups, one proposing that a genuine Bengali grammar should be written, breaking away from the Sanskrit grammatical tradition and the other heartily opposing their proposal. The major authors and intellectuals of the time, people like Haraprasad Sastri, Rabindranath Tagore, Ramendra Sundar Trivedi, Pramatha Chowdhury, Hirendranath Datta, etc., were advocating for an independent grammar of Bengali. The movement on Bengali grammar that Bangiya Sahitya Parishad started under Haraprasad Sastri had been intensified greatly by Tagore. Sastri's article, read out at the third monthly meeting of the Parishad (July, 1901 ), was highly appreciated by Tagore and inspired by him Tagore read out his article. Bānglā Krt O Taddhit, in the fifth monthly meeting of the Parishad (September 28. 1901) in the presence of Sastri. In this article he reminded that the Bengali language follows the rule of Bengali grammar.
Sarat Chandra Sastri (1862-1915) attacked Tagore brutally in his article on Natan Bangala Byakaran in the Bhāratī (1901). He wrote
A committee was formed comprising some members of the Parishad, known as Byãkaran Samiti. Its purpose was to compose Bengali grammar— pure and simple. Interestingly, most of the members of that committee ..... had hardly any knowledge of Sanskrit grammar.'
As a rejoinder to this criticism, Tagore read out his article on Bānglā Byākaran at the seventh monthly meeting of the Parishad (December 10, 1901). He said :
In the article, Bāngalā Byākaraņ, published in the journal of the Bangiya Sahitya Parishad in 190. Ramendra Sundar Trivedi wrote:
The Bengali language is completely different from Sanskrit. It has its own rules and principles like other languages. The Sahitya Parishad Patrika drew the attention of the scholars for the collection of such guiding rules and principles. Eminent men like Haraprasad Sastri and Rabindranath Tagore on behalf of the Parishad, appealed to the scholars for it.
No clear picture of a genuine Bengali grammar emerged from the vigorous debates that look place from time to time in the early years of the twentieth century. A major debate centred on the vocabulary. Tagore, Sastri, Trivedi, etc. were in favour of including all Bengali words — polite, vulgar, slang, etc in their framework while others were deadly against it. In the article, Bānglā Byākaraņ, published in the journal of the Bangiya Sahitya Parishad, Tagore wrote :
The Bengali language cannot be identified from the number of Sanskrit words it contains. The Bengali grammar will mainly deal with the Bengali words. The colloquial language must be taken into account for it. Many such colloquial words are obviously absent in Sanskritised Bengali.
In the article on Bāngālā Byākaraņ, published in the journal of the Parishad, Trivedi expressed the same view on this regard. He wrote :
The so-called Bengali grammar of the day cannot be taken as Bengali grammar properly. There is no Bengali grammar for pure Bengali words only. The Bengali grammar for purely Bengali words should be written. This is the primary aim of the Parishad.
They wanted to opt for a grammar of Calit Bengali. But it can be said that no one except Rabindranath has come forward to correct or redress the shortcomings of Bengali grammar demonstrated by Sastri. Sen commented
His Śabdatatrva (1909) contains some fundamental discoveries in the phonology of the modem Bengali language. The Bānglā Bhāşā Paricay (1939) contains some thoughtful suggestions for the grammarians of Bengali.
Grammars written by eminent Sanskrit scholars like Cintamani Gangopadhyay (Bāngālā Byākaraņ, 1881), Nakuleswar Vidyabhushan (Bhāşābodh Bāngālā Byākaraņ 1898) and Hrisikesh Sastri (Bāngālā Byākaraņ 1900) contain data from the colloquial speech which encourage them to propose a restructuring of the karaka system for Bengali among other things, shunning the prevalent system of Sanskrit. Among them, Vidyabhushan took the greatest pains in writing a grammar which would explain the rules both for colloquial as well as of chaste Bengali. Tagore judged rightly the value of Vidyabhushan's grammar in his article, Bhāşār Ingit. He said :
In his grammar. Nakuleswar Vidyabhushan sub-divided his discussions under three heads: Varņa Prakaraņ, Pada Prakaraņ, Bākya Prakaraņ.37 There is much novelty in his discussion on Phonetics. He cited different types of pronunciation of vowels. His work, though not exhaustive, is a unique one so far as a school text on grammar. He was not in favour of accepting either the Sanskrit or English grammar in toto while discussion on gender. He stated that the neuter gender in Bengali is non-existent. And his discussion on gender established him as a grammarian of quality. Another special characteristic of his grammar may be noticed. Some moderate grammarians in Bengali cited the rules and examples in Sanskrit first. Nakuleswar Vidyabhushan turned to Sanskrit examples only after elucidating with proper Bengali illustration.
Jogeshchandra Ray Vidyanidhi's Bāngālā Byākaraņ was the first part of his book Bāngālā Bhāşā that appeared in 1912.38 He stressed particularly on the morphology of the language. He carried out an in-depth study, mainly of the verbal system, primary and secondary suffixes, cases and compounds and indeclinables. He did not pay much attention to phonology. The study of the Bengali language that began towards the end of the nineteenth century on the basis of structure and etymology of words had its culmination in the writings of Jogeshchandra Ray Vidyanidhi. His approach and method of study have influenced the later historical linguists on the subject.
In 1935 Shahidullah’s
Bāngālā Byākaraņ (Bengali Grammar) was published from
In his grammar, the influence of Sanskrit is particularly evident in his treatment on morphology. In the Introduction of its first edition he stated that he had inserted first the conventional definitions of principles within brackets and then added the principles of Panini primarily to please the scholars of Sanskrit.41 His grammar had not been completely set free from the influence of Sanskrit. Nonetheless, he had been able to arouse the curiosity about a Bengali grammar in that period not based on Sanskrit.
The nominal system of the Bengali language may be taken for discussion from his grammar. The Bengali nominal system is much simpler than that of other Indian languages. Bengali has lost the grammatical gender system of Indo-Aryan, i.e., verbs or adjectives do not display any number/gender agreement with the noun. Shahidullah's discussion on gender followed the rules of Sanskrit grammar. According to him, they are of four types : 1) Masculine : e.g. bāp, chele, rājā, etc; 2) Feminine : e.g. mā, meye, rānī" etc; 3) Neuter: e.g., gāch, bātās, ghar, etc, and 4) Neutral: e.g., santān, bandhu, etc.. Suniti Kumar Chatterji in his Bhāşā Prakāś Bāngālā Byākaraņ, has shown three types of gender system, viz, masculine, feminine and neuter. He commented that this type of gender distinction is absent at present in colloquial Bengali.42
The term Kāraka is interpreted as case by Rammohan Ray in his grammar. However, the theory of Karaka seems to be only partially equivalent to the notion of case. Scholars like Haraprasad Sastri and Ramendra Sundar Trivedi discussed the difference between the theory of Kāraka and case. They mentioned that, in Sanskrit and Bengali. Kāraka refers to the relation of noun to the verb in a sentence. Unless the noun is somehow connected with the verb or it modifies the verb, it cannot be said to be in Karaka. Shahidullah's definition is : 'The relation of the other padas with the verb may be called Kāraka relation'. Although most of the Bengali scholars of the twentieth century noticed that the nature of the Bengali language is different from that of Sanskrit in many respects. Even they disagreed with the Sanskrit grammarians regarding the six basic Kāraka relations established by the latter. Still the six Kāraka relations are discussed in all Bengali grammars. Even in 1877, Syamacharan Gangopadhyay wrote : 'In the Bengali grammar books read in our schools, the Bengali cases are given the same in number as the cases in Sanskrit'. In the grammar of Shahidullah, there are six Kārakas in Bengali, viz, Karta (Nominative). Karma (Accusative), Karaņ (Instrumental), Sampradāh (Dative), Apādān (Ablative) and Adhikaraņ (Locative).
In Bengali, following the Sanskrit grammar, the genitive or possessive and vocative are not recognised as kāraka, since they have no direct connection with a verb. Sastri, Trivedi and Tagore commented that Sampradan Kārak should not be considered to be different from Karma Kārak. In traditional Indian grammar, the syntactic function of the other Kārakas, except the Katrkārak, is not mentioned. Bengali scholars like Trivedi suggested for the classification of Karakas in Bengali considering their behaviour. He preferred lo label them as neutral, since their relation to the verb syntagm is not as direct as the other (Katr, Karma). The neutral case is related to the predicator in a way which may be explained as adjunct to the predicative verb.
Shahidullah differed from them. He quoted the following rule of Sanskrit grammar : Kriyayā yamabhiprahi soapi sampradānam (or Kriyāyoge Caturthī). He mentioned that it will not be reasonable to evict Sampradān-kārak. It may be admitted from his discussion on the case system of Bengali that Sanskritisation was too deep rooted. The Bengali scholars of the later period differ from each other according to the number of Karakas. Sukumar Sen wrote that there are four cases in Bengali, viz, Kārta (Nominative), Karma (Accusative), Karaņ-Adhikaraņ (Instrumental -Locative) and Sambandha (Genitive).43 According to Pabitra Sarkar, "only three cases are morphologically relevant — dative, genitive and locative, while the rest of the case relationships are carried either without any suffix, or by a set of words called postpositions. 44
Shahidullah wanted to compose a Bengali grammar — pure and simple. But he could not free himself from his preconceived notions on Sanskrit grammar. Besides, he could not discard many of the things as he had to placate the renowned Sanskrit grammarians. His work on grammar can rightly be claimed as the pioneering work on the Bengali language in spite of its shortcomings. Without trying to undermine the sincere efforts of the Bengali grammarians of the early twentieth century it can never be denied that a true Bengali grammar was not written in this period. Suniti Kumar Chatterji was also very much aware of the defects of Bengali grammars of the nineteenth century. But his grammar, Bhāşā Prakāś Bāngālā Byākaraņ (1939) also is to a considerable extent written on the same model leaning on the rules and terminologies of the Sanskrit and English grammar. Today it is doubted how relevant the grammatical categories like number, gender, euphonic changes, compound, etc. are to Bengali. It is true that for a variety of reasons Bengali is indebted lo Sanskrit. But that should not justify the Bengali grammar to be dominated by the rules of Sanskrit grammar. It is needless to say that with an imposed framework of either English or Sanskrit we cannot describe the characteristics of Bengali.
1 Dravidian Linguistics : An Introduction : Kami! V. Zvelebil, Pondichery 1990.
3 A Grammar of the Bengal Language : N. B. Halhed, unabridged Facsimile edition, Ananda Publishers, Cal. Introduction.
5 Byākaraņkār Rammohan : Suniti Kumar Chatterji, Tattva Kaumudi Patrika, Maghotsab 1373 B.S. p. 19-26.
6 History of Bengali Literature : Sukumar Sen,
7 A Grammar of the Bengalee Language : W. Carey, Serampore
9 Bengalee Grammar in the English Language : Rammohan Roy,
10 The Seventh Report of the Calcutta School Book Society 's
Proceedings : 8th and 9th years, 1826-1827 :
11 Nānā Kathā : Pramatha Chowdhury, Sravan, 1320 B.S. p. 72-80.
12 Byākaraņkar” Rammohan : S. K. Chatterji ; Op. cit.
13 ODBL : S. K. Chatterji, Op. cit ; Preface.
14-16. Introduction to the Bengalee Language : Syamacharan Sarkar,
17 John Beames : G. A. Grierson : JRAS, 1902. pp 722-25. Outlines of Indian Philology and Other Philological Papers : John Beames : Indian Studies : Past and Present. Editor : Debiprasad Chatterjee
18 Grammar of the Bengali Language : John Beames,
19 Mr. Rabindranath Tagore's Notes on Bengali Grammar : J. D. Anderson, JAS, 1913, p 542
20 Hirendranath Datta : The Bengal Academy of Literature, Vol. 1, June 9, 1894, p. 3 ; Bangla Bhasatattva O Rabindranath : Krishna Das, Howrah, 1987.
21 Mr. Rabindranalh Tagore's Notes on Bengali Grammar : J. D. Anderson; JRA 1913 p. 533.
22 Bharau. Paus, 1305 B.S.
23 Bimser Bangla Byakaran: Rabindranath Tagore; Bharati, 1305.; Rabindra Racanabali (Vol. 14) : W.B. Govt.
24-25. Mr Rabindranath Tagore's Notes on Bengali Grammar: J.D. Anderson, JAS. 1913, p. 544.
26 Extract of the criticism was printed in Samācār
Darpaņ dated February 6, 1830 as quoted by Brajendranath Bandyopadhyay in
his Sambadpatre Sekaler Katha; Vol. 1, Third Edition. 1949; pp. 59-62.
Bānglā Bhāşār Byākaraņ O Tār
Kramobikāś: Nirmal Das,
28 Sahitya Parishad Patrika, Part 8 No. 2, 1308B.S.
29 Bānglā Krt 0 Taddhit : Rabindranath Tagore, I
30 Bhāratī. Agrahāyan 1308 B.S.
31 Bānglā Byākaraņ : Rabindranath Tagore : Sabdatattva ; Rabindra Racanabali, Vol. 14. W.B. Govt.
32 Bāngālā Byākaraņ: Ramendra Sundar Trivedi, Ramendra Racanabali, Vol. HI; Bangiya Sahitya Parishad, 1356 B.S.
33 Bānglā Byākaraņ : Rabindranath Tagore, Op.cit,
34 Bāngālā Byākaraņ : Ramendra Sundar Trivedi, Op. cit.
35 Prāsangik Tathya: Sukumar Sen; 1 laraprasad Sastri Racanā-samgraha, Vol. A; Pascim Banga Rajya Pustak Parsad, 1981 ; p. 603.
36 Bhāşār Ingit: Rabindranath Tagore : Śabdatattva ; Rabindra Racanabali, Vol. 14 ; Op. cil.
37 Bhāşābodh Bāngālā
Byākaraņ : Nakulsvar Vidyabhushan. Sixth Edition,
38 Bāngālā Bhāşā: Pratham Bhāg: Bāngālā Byākaraņ: Jogesh Chandra Ray Vidyanidhi, Bangiya Sahitya Parishad, 1319.
39 Bāngālā Byākaraņ :
40 Bāngālā Byākaraņ :
43 Bhāşār Itivrtta
: Sukumar Sen,
44 Bengali : Pabitra Sarkar : Comparative Indian Literature, Vol. 1 : Chief Editor : K. M. George, Kerala Sahitya Akademi 1984.
(History of the Bengali Language) His another important work can be taken as
one of the major works on the Bengali language. His long association with the
comparative-historical study of languages and teaching career prompted him into
this venture. The book was published by the
Suniti Kumar Chatterji's
monumental work, The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language has been
prescribed by me at the
Introduction : A Brief History of the Bengali Language. Chapter 1 : Development from Indo-European Parent Language to Modern Bengali. Chapter 2 : Origin of the Bengali Language : Different views. Chapter 3 : Eastern group of New Indo-Aryan Languages. Chapter 4 : Stages of Bengali. Chapter 5 : Non-Aryan Influence on the Bengali Language. Chapter 6: Foreign Influence. Chapter 7 : Bengali Dialects. Chapters : Bengali Phonology. Chapter 9 : Etymology of Modern Bengali words. Chapter 10 : Accent. Chapter 11 : Development of Old Indo-Aryan Vowels in Bengali. Chapter 12 : Development of Old Indo-Aryan Consonants in Bengali. Chapter 13 : History of Case-endings. —The Pronoun —The Numerals — The Verb — The Verbal Endings in Modern Bengali — Origin of the Verbal Endings in Bengali — Some Verb-roots in Bengali — aha-, aāch-, abal-, arah-, ajā-, ale-, ade-. Primary suffixes in Bengali — Secondary Suffixes in Bengali. Vocabulary. Syntax. In its later editions, two articles were included as an Appendix, viz., Hind-Ārya Mūlbhāşā Bā Adim Prākrt (The Indo-Aryan Parent Speech or Proto Prakrit) and Jelā Cabbiś Paragaņār Upabhāşā (The Dialect of the District of 24 Parganas).
In this book he has
incorporated the views in brief expressed by his predecessors like Beames,
Hoernle. Grierson, Chatterji on the Bengali language and linguistics along with
it his own approach to the subject. He put forward his own views on the date
and origin of the language. According to him, the Bengali language had its
origin in 650 A.D. His views have not been accepted by other scholars. He cited
the views expressed by Sylvain Levi. According to Levi, Matsyendranath went to
According to Sylvain Levi,
Matsyendranath went to
But he did not mention the name of the dictionary or anything about it. Hence his views have not been accepted by scholars. Mansur Musa wrote :
He did not elaborate further Sylvain Levi's views. He did not utter a single word about the Dictionary. Thus the views expressed by Shahidullah were neither accepted nor opposed. His views remained unnoticed.
Shahidullah held that the immediate ancestor of Bengali is not Magadhi Prakrit but Gaudī Prakrit. There were dialectal variations of Middle Indo- Aryan mentioned by Prakrit grammarians, e.g. Māhārāştī, Śauraseni, Māgadhī, Paiśācī" Gaudī, etc. According to Shahidullah, "we can find out the characteristics of the Gaudī Prakrit by philological research'.4 The followings are the phonological peculiarities of Gaudi" Prakrit : 1) Retention of both dental and palatal sibilants, dental and cerebral nasals and initial b, j in place of OIA v and y. Thus OIA sesa 'end', vana 'forest', venu 'bamboo', yah 'who' became in Gaudī" sesa (with palatal and dentals), bana, benu, je as distinguished from Māhārāştri and other Prakrits, sesa (with both dentals), vana (with cerebral n), venu (with cerebral n), jo (ye in Magadhi). In the verbal system, the past tense was formed with the pleonastic suffix -ila added to the OIA past participle. The future tense was indicated by the participle with -tavya, e.g. OIA. cakara 'he did', krta 'was done'; Gaudī kaila as distinguished from Māhārāştrī kaa, Magadhi kata (with cerebral t); OIA karisyati 'he will do' > karissati (or karissati with palatal s) > Gaudī kariabba 'it will be done' as distinguished from Maharastrf karissai. In the vocabulary the words of the eastern dialect of the common Old Indo-Aryan spoken speech were inherited by Gaudi Prakrit, but not found in other branches, e.g., Beng. kade "he weeps' < Gaudi kandai < krandati; Beng. phele 'he throws' < Gaudi pellai < prerayaa etc, elsewhere roe, phenke etc.
Prakrit has been mentioned by name by Dandin (about 600 A.D.). In his
Kavyādarśa (1.35) he said : Śaurasenica Gaur
About 400 A.D. Gauda
evolved out of Gaudī
Prakrit. A late Prakrit grammarian Markaņdeya has mentioned it in a list of 27 Apabhramśas,
such as Pancala, Malava, Gauda, Odra ete. Rudrata said : Şaşthohatra
bhuri bhedo deśabiśeşadapabhramśah i.e., 'sixthly here are many kinds of
Apabhramsa owing to the difference of countries'. Shahidullah stressed that it
was certainly this Apabhramśa
that was prevalent in old
'it was this Gauda Apabhramśa that gave rise to Bengali’. ...Gaudīya Bhāşā is the name which survived till very recent times, when modern literary Bengali was used to be called Gaudīya Sādhu Bhāşā.' 6
According to him, this
Gauda Apabhramsa can be reconstructed with the help of Old Bengali compared, on
one hand with its cognate languages, Assamese, Oriya and Bihari in their
earliest known forms, and on the other hand with the Apabhramsa known from the
grammarians. The following peculiarities of this Gauda Apabhramsa are noticed
by him : 1) Loss of endings in the nominative and objective, 2) In the nominal sentence,
the ending -e was added to the subject and the predicate-adjective of the words
ending with -a, 3) Use of the endings -e in instrumental, -kara and -ka in
genitive, -hu in ablative and -e and -hi in locative, 4) Use of-ilia to
indicate past tense, -ibba to indicate future tense. This type of Apabhramsa
has been to some extent preserved in the Dohākoşas of Kanha (about
700 A.D.) and Saraha (about 1000 A.D.) and in the Prakrita Pingala. His
examples are given here. 1) Buddha ghoraa dekkhai (= Buddha ghora dekhe). 2)
Ehu gacche badde (= Ei gach bada), 3) Ramkeri baritta bahutta gacchani acchanti
(= Ramer barite bahut gach ache), 4) Bahini ghare gaitti (= Bon ghare
' We may take a sentence
to illustrate the different stages of Bengali upto the Indo-European Parent
Speech. Modern Beng: Buddher ghora achhe. Middle Beng : Buddhera ghora achhe.
Old Beng : Buddhera ghora achhau Gauda Apabhramsa : Buddha-era ghoraa achchhai
Gaudi Prakrit: Buddhakero ghorao achchhai Old
[The vernaculars, descended from an Old Indo-Aryan spoken speech, which was a cognate language with Vedic and Sanskrit, but not identical with them, are called by Shahidullah 'Primitive Prakrit']
Primitive IA: Buddhasya
In the Linguistic Survey of India, Grigrson recognizes seventeen languages in all under the IA family, of which seven are in the Outer sub-branch, nine in the Inner and one in Mediate, as follows :
Outer Sub-branch : A.
North-Western 1. Lahnda, 2. Sindhi, B. Southern : 3. Marathi. C. Eastern : 4.
Oriya, 5. Bihari, 6. Bengali, 7. Assamese, D. Mediate ; 8. Eastern Hindi, E.
Central : 9. Western Hindi, 10. Panjabi, 11. Gujarati, 12. Bhili, 13.
Khandeshi. 14. Rajasthani, F. Pahari : 15.
It will appear that Grierson's classification of the IA languages differ from that of Beames' on many accounts. Unlike Beames, Grierson recognises Assamese as a separate language even while admitting that it is a dialect of Bengali and it shares a common grammar. Grierson placed the Bihari group of languages in the Bengali-Oriya-Assamese group on the grounds that Bihari, Bengali and Oriya have been common descendants of Magadhi Apabhramsa.
Suniti Kumar Chatterji accepted
the broad framework of the IA classification handed over to him by Grierson,
yet he differed from him significantly on many counts. Chatterji rejected
Grierson's consent of Inner, Outer and Mediate sub-branches of the 1A
languages. His classification is as follows : A. Udīcya (Northern) : 1.
Sindhi, 2. Lahnda (Western Panjabi), 3. Panjabi (Eastern Panjabi}, B.
Prāticya (Western) : 4. Gujarati, 5. Rajasthani, C. Madhyadeśa (
'Indo-Aryan speakers from the plains, mostly from Rajputana, migrated north into the Himalayas among the khasas, and Hinduised them, from the early centuries of the Christian era; and the Indo-Aryan dialects they brought completely killed off the original speech of the khasas, and became transformed into the present-day Pahari dialects, which are thus forms of Southwestern (Rajasthani)IA,...' 9
Chatterji did not
subscribe to Hoernle's views that the Aryans came to
1. Old Indo-Aryan (1500-600 B.C.),
2. Middle Indo-Aryan (600 B.C.-1000 A.D.) and New Indo-Aryan (1000 A.D. onwards). He further sub-divided the Middle Indo-Aryan into three sub-groups :
a) Early stage (600-200 B.C.) : (Asokan Prakrit and Pali as types),
b) Transitional stage (200 B.C.-200 A.D.) : (The Prakrits of the earlier inscriptions—Kharoşthī and Brāhmī— as types),
c) Second MIA stage (200-600 A.D.): (Dramatic Prakrits—Śauraseni, Māhārāştrī and Māgadhi, and Jaina Ardha-Māgadhī as types),
d) Third MIA stage (Apabhramsa) (600-1000 A.D.).
Shahidullah's perception was different from that of Chatterji. The Indo-Iranian Aryan parent speech gave rise to the Old Indo-Aryan speech about 1200 B.C. when the Vedic hymns were first composed. They were transmitted orally for generations. About 800 B.C. when they were collected and put down in writing, the written speech showed later forms in grammar and vocabulary. But that vulgar speech, perhaps of the Vratyas, retained some Old Indo-Iranian features and also added some new elements. 'It thus became the common Indo-Aryan Parent Speech sometime about 600 B.C. We may call it Proto Prakrit'. All the modern Indo-Aryan vernaculars in the Indo-Pakistan sub-continent are descended from 'this Proto-Prakrit’. The Proto Prakrit speech had to pass through three main stages before it developed into modern IA vernaculars: 1) First Middle Indo-Aryan or Old Prakrit, 2) Second Middle Indo-Aryan or Secondary Prakrit and 3) Third Middle Indo-Aryan or Late Prakrit, represented by Apabhramsa.
The classification of the New Indo-Aryan languages, as proposed by Grierson, is given below :
N1A Languages: 1. Pratīcya: Sindhi, Lahndi, Kasmiri.
2. Madhyadeśīya: Western Hindi. Panjabi, Rajasthani, Gujarati, Pāhārī group of languages.
3. Central: Eastern Hindi.
4. Prācya: Bengali, Assamese, Oriya, Bihari group of languages.
5. Dākşiņātya: Marathi, Konkani.
The classification of the New Indo-Aryan languages, as followed by Chatterji, is given below :
N1A Languages: 1. Udīcya: Gypsy, Sindhi, Lahndi, Eastern Panjabi, Pahari group of languages.
3. Madhyadeśīya : Hindusthani, Hindi Urdu, Brajabhasa, etc.
4. Prācya : Eastern Hindi. Bihari languages, Bengali, Assamese, Oriya.
5. Dākşiņātya: Marathi, Konkani.
The classification, given by Shahidullah, is given below10 :
N1A languages: 1. Pratīcya: Sindhi, Lahndi, Eastern Panjabi, Kasmiri.
2. Madhyadeśīya: Hindusthani (Hindi, Urdu), Rajasthani, Gujarati, Pahari languages, Brajabhasa (Khariboli).
3. Madhyabarti: Awadhi, Baghea, Chattisgarhi, Nagpuriya.
4. Prācya: Bihari languages (Maithili, Magahi, Bhojpuriya),Odra-Banga-Kamarupi.
5. Dākşiņātya: Marathi, Konkani.
According to him, the Odra-Banga-Kamarupi group of the Eastern languages is again sub-divided into two, viz., Oriya and Banga-Kamarupi. The latter is again divided into Bengali and Assamese.
According to Chatterji, the Bengali language may be conveniently divided into three periods :
1) The Formative or Old Bengali Period : (950-1200 A.D).,
2) Middle Bengali Period : (1200-1800 A.D.) and
3) Modern Bengali Period (from 1800). Chatterji sub-divided the Middle Bengali period into three groups :
a) Transitional Middle Bengali: (1200-1300 A.D.),
b) Early Middle Bengali Period: (1300-1500 A.D.).
c) Late Middle Bengali Period (1500-1800 A.D.).
In his Bāngālā Bhāşār Itivrttu, Shahidullah divided the Bengali language into four stages : Old Bengali (650-1200), Transitional Stage (1200-1350), Middle Bengali (1350-1800) and Modern Bengali (from 1800). Elsewhere he attempted another classification. In his essay on A Brief History of the Bengali Language, he divided the language into three stages, viz., Old Bengali (700-1300), Middle Bengali (1300-1800) and Modern Bengali (1800 A.D. onwards). However, he made no mention of any criteria that he adopted while classifying the stages. He indiscriminately applied the language and its literature before going through the period of the language and the period of literature properly. Mansur Musa wrote :
According to Shahidullah,
Bengali dialects may be broadly divided into two main divisions : 1) the
Western and 2) the Eastern : 'This division of the dialects corresponds roughly
to the old division of
Shahidullah asserted that
the chaste language (i.e., sadhubhasa) has developed from the spoken form of
is primarily based on the colloquial speeches of
He showed historical
evidence in proof of his claim that Caņdīdās, Krttibas,
Guņaraj Khān, etc. hailed from
It can be proved
historically that the sadhubhasa was based on the colloquial language of
He commented that it can
be said that the standard Bengali comes nearest to the dialect of the district
of Nadia. Nadia was the home of Sanskrit learning in
‘Thus by the happy
combination of a number of circumstances the dialect of Nadia became the
standard language of
The Bengali translation of his essay entitled 'Munda Affinities of Bengali' is included as a chapter in his hook as Bāngālā Bhāşāy Muņdā' Prabhāb. According to his opinion.
'It is only natural to suppose that Bengali is linguistically a submerged area which was once an Austric-speaking country....the Austric speakers of Bengal have left not only the traces of their speech habit in Bengali, but have also contributed some everyday words to its vocabulary.17
e.g. akal (famine), Kala (deaf), larai (fight), etc. While commenting on this book, Mansur Musa said
His treatment of modern Bengali vowels and consonants is really quite exhaustive and precise. For his brief discussion on the accent system he can no doubt earn praise. While commenting on the accent system, Shahidullah wrote :
In his chapter on the history of case-endings, he discussed on the modern Bengali case-endings and their application.
Nominative case-endings : zero, -e, -te.
According to S. K. Chatterji, the development of the ending -e is as follows :
pute<*puttai < puttae” <puttagẽ< puttake <OIA. putrakah.
Shahidullah explained it in another way. OIA instrumental ending -ena >MIA. -ena
-ẽ >Old Bengali -ẽ, e >Modern Bengali -e (dialectal) e.g.
Rāme khāy cf. Rām
Accusative case-endings : zero, -e, -ke, -re (dialectal)
Instrumental case-endings : -e, -te.
Dative case-endings : According lo Shahidullah 's opinion, there is a marked distinction between the endings of the accusative and the dative in Modern Bengali. He wrote :
Ablative case-endings: Modern Bengali does not possess an ending for the ablative. Use of post-positions like haite, theke, ceye, to denote case relations is found.
Genitive case-endings : The earlier case-indicators which were established in MIA. underwent phonetic reduction like all other element in speech, and from these were derived a good many new affixes in New Indo-Aryan. Thus, e.g., from OIA. Kārya- (through MIA. *Kaira->Kera-), we gel the Bengali genitive affix -er,-r. Shahidullah wrote :
Locative case-endings: -e, -te, -etc. According to S. K. Chatterji, the locative ending -ta is derived from the present participle -ante, e.g. māngata< Old Bengali māngala< māngabãta< māngaanta< mārgaantah.21 Shahidullah rejected his explanation. According to him, the derivation is as follows : banatra> banatta>banata > [-tra> -tta> -ta]. OIA –tra> p. pkt. -ttha, Eastern Asokan Inscription, -tta. Shahidullah wrote:
Nominative plural case endings; -rā, -erā. To indicate the nominative plural, the inherited instrumental and genitive plural forms were extended to function as the nominative as well. When this was not found to be explicit, the system of forming the plural by agglutination or compounding was more widely adopted. Thus, words like sab (<sabba<sarva), sakala, samūha, gana, loka>lok, log, etc. came to be added to the noun, e.g. lok-guli, etc.
The gradual development of honorific pronouns forms another peculiarity of some forms of New Indo-Aryan. A tendency towards this is noticeable in OIA when bhavan, bhavati and a few similar words used in the third person began to feature as honorific. In the eastern group of NIA languages the old plural of the first person has taken up the function of the singular. New plural forms have had to be built up with the help of the old singular or plural base. The old singular has generally become obsolete or is found as a vulgar form (only in Assamese and in North Bengali among the dialects of the East the old singular functions as singular and the plural as plural). Thus, Bengali āmi (the old singular mui is vulgar), Oriya āmbhe (mũ is vulgar); but in Assamese we have singular mai, plural āmi.
The following forms of the Modern Bengali personal pronouns are discussed by Shahidullah in his Bāngālā Bhāşār Itivrtta.' 24
First Persons mui, āmi morā, āmrā
Second Person tui, tumi torā, tomrā
Third Person se, tini tāhara, tāhara.
The verbal system is a little complicated. The inflected passive and the optative and the sigmatic future were considerably curtailed during NIA times in the different areas. The most important fact has been the establishment of some of the participles as tense-bases : krta> kia-: kurvant-> karanta-> karantā -kartā, karit-, karat-; kartavya-> kariabba, karib-, karab-, etc.. There arc three tenses in NIA, a simple present, a simple past (everywhere of participle origin, being from the OIA. passive participle in -ta, -ita) and a simple future. The NIA stage as a whole inherited for the past tense an active construction in the case of the intransitive verbs and a passive construction in the case of transitive verbs. In the eastern group of NIA languages the passive construction has been turned into an active one by making the past base a regular verb to which personal terminations corresponding to the subject have been added, e.g., Old Bengali mar-il-a (masc and neuter): mār-il-ī (fem) 'struck' was a past verb-form which was used as an adjective, following the old passive construction; but in Modern Bengali we have active forms like mār-il-ām : mār-il-i: mār-il-a or dialectally mār-il-e>mārle. etc.. Personal terminations as added to the verb came in after the full development of NIA. It is an independent development in each of the different languages.
Shahidullah discussed the development of Modern Bengali personal terminations from OIA, through MIA, Late MIA, Old Bengali and Middle Bengali stages.
Present Tense Indicative Mood : a cal-
Skt. Pkt. Apabhar. O.B. M.B. Mod.Beng.
Sg. 3p. calali calai calai calai calae,cale cale
PI. 3p. calanti calanti calanti, calanti, calanti, calen
calahi calathi calenta
Sg. 2p. calasi calasi calasi, calasi calasi calis
PI. 2p. calalha calittha calahu calaha calaha cala
Sg. lp. calāmi calāmi, calaũ calama, calõ
PI. Ip. calāmah calāmo calahũ
Present Tense Imperative Mood : a cal-
Skt. Pkt. Apabhr. O.B. M.B. Mod.Beng.
Sg. 3p. calatu calau calau calau calu,caluk caluk
Pl. 3p. calantu calantu calantu, calantu calunta calun
Sg. 2p. cala cala, calu, cala cala, cal
calesu,calesu, calāhi, calā
calehi, calāhi calahi,
Pl. 2p. calata pali calatha, calahu, calaha, calaha cala
pkt. calaha calehu calahu
Sg. 1p. calani p.calāmi, calau x x x
Pl. 1p. calāma calimo,calemo, calahũ caliau caliu x
The Verbal Endings of the Past Tense Modern Bengali
Modern Bengali Oriya Assamese
Sg. 3p. a ā e
Pl. 3p. ena e a,e
Sg. 2p. i u i
Pl. 2p. e a ā
Sg. 1p. āma i õ
Pl. 1p. āma u õ
The Verbal Endings of the Future Tense.
Sg. 3p. e a a
Pl. 3p. ena e a
Sg. 2p. i u i
Pl. 2p. e a ā
Sg. 1p. a i ṁ
Pl. 1p. a ũ, a ṁ
Origin of the Endings :
Modern Bengali calen< Middle Bengali calenta<Old Bengali calanti<MIA. calanti < OIA calanti. Chatterji explained it in another way. He wrote : 'The change of OIA -nt- normally is to -t- in Bengali, not to n : calen therefore does not represent OIA. calanti. The form has obtained its -n- (further reduced to a mere nasalisation in dialectal Bengali) ultimately from the plural -na- of the noun.' 25 Shahidullah wrote :
While commenting on the first personal plural ending, Shahidullah said :
Modern Bengali uses the suffix -k with the imperative third person singular. In Middle Bengali -ka was the optional suffix with other moods and tenses and persons. Shahidullah said :
In his article, Munda Affinities of Bengali, Shahidullah wrote that in Santālĩ - ok is used lo denote the passive voice; it is also common in transitive verbs, where it is optional as san, sanak "go'; hach, hijuk 'come' etc..
'Bengali -ka with verbs is quite different from the pleonastic -ka suffix of the Old Indo-Aryan, where it is infixed before the final vowel.' 29
The second person ending
-i occurs with the past in -
'In the absence of any other indication as to its source, it can only be referred to the; 2 sg. imperative in -hi, -ahi, which would give -i. -ai by loss of-h-.' 30
Shahidullah explained it as follows :
-i<Late Middle Bengali -isa< Old Middle Bengali -isi<-āsi, e.g. Kemane mailisi soālĩ (Srikrsnakirttana); lukailis dare, etc. lie wrote :
Shahidullah made a discussion of the following verb-roots in modern Bengali, namely, aha-, aach-, abat-, arah-, aja-, ale-, ade-and aas-. According to him, modern Bengali hay< Middle Bengali hae< Old Bengali hoi< P. hoi< Skt. bhavati.32 According to Chatterji, the root ha represents two roots which have merged into one, 1) ho < Skt. bhava from the root bhu-, and 2) ah or ha < Skt. as-.33 Shahidullah suggested that :
Words are built up from roots by prefixes and suffixes and of the latter there are two varieties, primary and secondary. Primary suffixes are added to words which have been already derived. These constitute the most useful as well as the most instructive aids in the building up of language. Primary suffixes in Bengali (krt Pratyay): The following primary suffixes, as discussed by Shahidullah, are mentioned here :35
-a-<Skt a-; -ala- <-ata<Skt. -anta; -ana- <Skt. bandhana; -ani<Skt anat+-ikā, e.g. kampanika>kāpuni;-āo : gherāo, cadāo<-āu<Pkt. ābua<Skt. āpuka(=āp+u+ka+ā);-ān : cālān,jog”an<Pkt. ābana<Skt. āpana;-oyā :bacoyā <āuā<Pkt. ābua<Proto Pkt. āpuka (=āp + uka); -iye/-iye : gāiye/gāīye<Pkt. āiaa<Proto Pkt. aka+ika+ka; e.g. khāiye <khāaiaa <Proto Pkl. khadakikaka = Skt. khādaka.
Secondary Suffixes in Bengali (Taddhita Pratyay) : The bases that are derived from other bases by the addition of certain suffixes are called secondary derivatives and these suffixes are called Taddhita suffixes. The difference between krt and Taddhita suffixes lies in the fact that the former are added to roots, and the latter to nominal bases formed from roots. Words formed by the krt suffixes are used not only as verbs but also as adjectives and substantives, while those formed by the Taddhita suffixes are used only as adjectives and substantives. Some of these Taddhita suffixes, as given by Shahidullah, are mentioned here together with their derivatives.36
-a<Old Beng. ā<Pkt. a<Skt. ka, e.g. hare<Old Beng. hariā<Pkt. haria <Skt. harika.
-ā<OldBeng. ā<Pkt. bā<Skt. bāt, e.g. jalā<*jalaā <Pkt. jalabā<Skt. Jalabat.
-ai<Middle Beng. ai, añi<Old Beng. abī<Pkt, Skt. amī,e.g. sātai<sātai, satani <sātabī < Pkt. sattamī < Skt. saptami. According to Chatterji's ODBL, seventh = sātui <*sātaī, sātuī <MIA. sattamika for Skt. sapta -ma.
-āi <Pkt. -īa <Skt. Kīya = ka+ īya, e.g, corāi<Pkt. coraīa<Skt. corakīya.
-āmi<Pkt. ammī <Skt. karmī, e.g. gharāmi<gharaammi<grhakarmi.
-al < Pkt.-bāl < Skt. pāl, e.g. rākhāl <rākhoyāl <rakkhabāl <Skt. raksapāl.
-āli <Old Beng. āli < *alia <P. karia < Skt- kārya e.g. mitāli <*mitta alia <*mitta-galia <mitta-kariya <mitra-kārya. cf. Assamese caturāli.
-i <-i<Pkt. iā<Skt. ikā, e.g. churi<Pkt. churiā<Skt. ksurika.
-oyā <Pkt. bā <Skt. bat, e.g. ca”̃doyā <candaba <Skt. candrabat.
-ci < Persian -ci, e.g. bāburci.
-dā<Pkt. -daa<Skt. -taka, e.g. āmda<Pkt. āmbadaa <OIA. amrataka, cf. Pali amātaka.
-dāri<Persian dārī, e.g. dokāndari.
-panā<Pkt. ppana<Vedic tvana= Skt. tva, e.g. guņapanā<Pkt. gunappana < vedic guņatvana.
Though a number of books have been written on the subject of which this book is the product, Shahidullah's book has a greater unity of design. His book analysed critically the various theories regarding the origin of the Bengali language. In his investigation into the grammatical structure of modern Bengali nominal and verbal systems, the colloquial forms have been duly taken into account. It is a much more detailed study than the one published earlier in 1935 under the title-Bāngālā Byākaraņ. This is the book which expressed his linguistic maturity with an extremely logical mind and practical bent. His linguistic acumen and the method of taking into account every nuance of expression even in colloquial Bengali, had earned him a coveted place among the greatest linguists of his time.
1 Bāngālā Bhāşār Itivrtta
: Md. Shahidullah,
2 Bāngālā Bhāşār Itivrtta:
Md. Shahidullah, Shahidullah Racanabali, Vol. 3,
3 Bhāşātāttvik Dr. Muhammad Shahidullah: Mansur Musa, Shahidullah Smārakgrantha.
4 The Origin of the Bengali Language :
5 A Brief History of the Bengali Language:
7 The Origin of the Bengali Language :
8 The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language: Suniti Kumar Chatterji, Op.cil., p. 9.
9 Ibid, p. 10.
10 Bāngālā Bhāşār Itivrtta
: Md. Shahidullah,
11 Bhāşāttvik Dr. Muhammad Shahidullah : Mansur Musa; Shahidullah Smārakgrantha, Op.cit.. p. 200.
12 A Brief History of the Bengali Language :
14 A Brief History of the Bengali Language:
15 Ibid. p. 574-5.
16 Munda Affinities of Bengali:
18 Bāngālā Bhāşār Itivrtta : Md. Shahidullah; Racanābalī, Vol. 3, p. 61.
19 Ibid. p. 80.
20 Ibid, pp. 81-82.
21 ODBI. : S. K. Chatterji; Op.cit, p. 750.
22 Bāngālā Bhāşār Itivrtta; Op.cit. p. 84.
23 Ibid. p. 88.
24 ODBI.. p. 936.
25 Bāngālā Bhāşār Itivrtta, pp. 102-103.
26 Ibid. p. 103.
27 Ibid. p. 105.
28 Munda Affinities of Bengali:
29 ODBL. p. 978.
30 Bāngālā Bhāşār Itivrtta, p. 113.
31 Ibid. p. 114.
32 ODBL. p. 1038.
33 Bāngālā Bhāşār Itivrtta. p. 114.
34 Ibid, p. 119.
35 Ibid. p. 121.
In the modern world, dictionaries of all kinds assume an ever-growing importance. The linguistic dictionaries are primarily concerned with language, i.e., with the lexical units of language and all their linguistic properties, viz., pronunciation, etymology, grammatical category, etc. Linguistic dictionaries can be divided into different categories by different criteria. One of the most important divisions of linguistic dictionaries is that between the general and the special ones.
Within the category of general dictionaries, it is useful to discern two different types again viz., Standard-Descriptive dictionaries and Overall-Descriptive dictionaries.1 The principal domain of a Standard-Descriptive dictionary is the standard national language. It describes only regular, normal usage. It docs not describe dialectal or regional words. The best example of such a dictionary is Dictionaire de 1' Academic (franchise) in any of its edition (first edition 1694). An Overall-Descriptive dictionary the general language tries to help the user to understand all the texts and communications likely to be read and heard by him, with the exception of the most technical ones. As an example of such an Overall-Descriptive dictionary can be indicated Webster's Third.
Special dictionaries either cover a specific part of the vocabulary or arc prepared with some definite purpose. On the basis of the nature of their word-lists, the dialect dictionaries may be grouped under the special dictionaries.2
Dialect dictionaries present all the characteristics of a general dictionary in their description of the lexical units. But they deal with the word stock of a particular geographical region or social group. The dictionaries usually contain words not found in the standard language, i.e., words which are variations of the standard form or words whose meanings are restricted to a particular area or social group. The dialect dictionaries are based either on oral material and (eventually) different questionnaires, or on written sources (if there are texts written in the dialect) or on both. If there are numerous written texts and if they have a sufficiently long tradition, the respective dialect dictionary will naturally tend to acquire a historical character.
There is a very long tradition of specialised glossaries listing the vocabulary of local dialects and many general dictionaries include a selection of regionalisms. However, it was not until nineteenth century historical-comparative linguists and folklorists carried out systematic fieldwork that dialectology became established in many countries, leading to the development of a special dictionary genre. There is still no unified framework and dialect dictionaries can range from the popular-amateurists to the philological-scholarly, with considerable differences between various linguistic and cultural traditions.
THE BEGINNING OF SYSTEMATIC DIALECT STUDY
Before the nineteenth
century, linguists in
One way of doing this, is to write grammars and dictionaries of regional dialects and this approach was initiated by Johann Andreas Schmeller (1785-1852). who published a grammar of his own Bavarian dialect of German in 1821.4
Around the middle of the
century, a number of people threw themselves into such work in various parts of
The earliest systematic
study of dialect arose out of the controversy centering round the
Neo-grammarian principles of the inviolability of sound laws. This controversy
led to the planning of the first linguistic atlases in
Georg Wenker (1852-1911)
compiled the first dialect atlas of
He drew up a set of forty sentences composed so as to illustrate phonological and morphological points and circulated them to primary school teachers throughout his native district, for translating into each local dialect using ordinary' German spelling conventions. This had the advantage of producing a huge volume of data but the disadvantage that the school teachers, having no training, were not thorough or reliable in their reporting.
The French linguist Jules
Gillieron (1854-1926) tried another technique observing the difficulties with
Wenker's approach. He sent out E. Edmont into the field with a set of
questionnaire to sample the folk dialects spoken in 639 communities of
With certain modifications
and refinements, the later large-scale surveys of
The scientific study of
But the efficacy of the English Dialect Dictionary is vitiated by the fact that 'its material is extracted from glossaries whose dates range over too long a period of time and that the designations of locality are far too vague' .9 But in spite of these and other failings, English Dialect Dictionary, is an indispensable source of earlier forms for the lexicologist.
The next major step was
planned in 1946 by Swiss Professor Eugene Dieth (1893-1956) and British Scholar
(later Leeds Professor of English) Harold Orton (1898-1975) and became known
informally as the Dieth-Orton Survey. A questionnaire of over 1300 items was
developed and a field survey undertaken between 1948 and 1961 in 313 localities
The scientific study of
the regional dialects of the
DIALECT SITUATION IN BENGALI
Bengali, one of the major
Indo-Aryan languages of
The literary language
(Sadhu bhasa) shows greater conservatism in word morphology as well as in
lexis. The less conservative style identified with the spoken language (Calit
bhasa) is the everyday medium of informal discourse. Dimock (1960) quotes a
study by Gordon H. Fairbanks (1955), which showy that Sadhu Bhasa and Calit
Bhasa have 39.5% correspondence in lexical items and that 51.1% of the lexical
items showed differing forms in Sadhu Bhasa, and Calit Bhasa.13
Quite often there are direct pairings, i .e., Sadhu Bhasa and Calit Bhasa use
two quite different words for the same semantic value. These pairings are
similar to those described by
'It has long been
recognised that there are at least two distinct forms of the Bengali
language—the Sadhu Bhasa (Literary Language) and the Calit Bhasa (Colloquial
Language). This condition of having two different forms of a language, with the
distinction between them relating to prestige or other extra-Linguistic values,
is not an unfamiliar one.
In all speech-communities there are regional variations in the way the people speak, "giving rise to horizontal dialects based on geographical areas.' The regional dialects represent another major division of the Bengali language. In recent years there has been a marked shift from regional to social dialects, producing new dictionary types. A great deal of the descriptive and analytical work on social dialects over the years has been concerned with vocabulary though the differences are not so basic in Bengali.
The Bengali speech-community, in addition to dialect variation in terms of literary-colloquial, regional differences and social strata, has Hindu-Muslim dialect based on the common affiliation of the people. The principal differences between the speech of the Hindus and Muslims in Bengali are on the lexical level.
Although there are marked differences in the use of the language in terms of social class, educational level and religion, the greatest differences arc among regional dialects.
STUDY OF REGIONAL DIALECTS
Bhandarkar delivered a course of seven lectures on Sanskrit in its several forms, of which the fourth, the fifth and the sixth lectures are devoted to the study of the modern Indian languages which he calls by the name of vernaculars. He possessed a first-hand knowledge of the most modern languages like Hindi, Sindhi, Marathi, Gujarati, Bengali and Oriya. In spite of the professions of the neo-grammarians that the spoken form of a language was primary and that the dialects were important for the study of a language, there was no survey of Indian languages and dialects which was later carried out by Grierson.
have been made to all branches of linguistics by the activities of the
Christian missionaries who came to
'The following words, which are used in different villages of the Dhaka district, are found in his Dictionary, e.g., 'akaf, 'badam’, 'gatar", 'makunda', ‘ab’ ‘akus', 'aliya', "alguchi', 'amuha', 'camcara' etc.. His Dictionary may be considered as the first book on Bengali dialectology.'
William Carey was one of
the earliest of the British missionaries to have devoted himself to learning
Bengali and teaching it. In 1800 the
His Kathopakathan or Dialogues in Bengali, was first printed at Serampore in 1801. The class of men who are supposed to carry on these dialogues ranges from that of a Sahib, a respectable Bengali gentleman, a merchant, a zamindar and a Brahmin priest to that of a peasant, a low-class woman, a day-labourer, a fisherman and a beggar. He wrote :
'That the work might be as complete as possible, I have employed some sensible natives to compose dialogues upon subjects of a domestic nature, and to give them precisely in the natural style of the persons supposed to be speakers’
Carey believed that these dialogues would 'furnish a considerable idea of the domestic economy of the country'. Recorded examples of the actual colloquial style of Bengali speech are not available earlier than in Carey's Dialogues (1801). In his A Universal Dictionary of Oriental Languages, a multi-lingual dictionary of thirteen Indian languages. Carey had drawn particular attention to the dialects of different regions. Unfortunately, the manuscript of the dictionary had been destroyed by fire before going to press.
Henry Pitts Forster (1766-1815), another expert of the period, published A Vocabulary in two parts, English and Bengalee and vice versa (1799,1802). The Vocabulary was 'one of the most valuable and painstaking lexicons of the language ever published.'20In its Introduction Forster wrote: 'The language of Bengal is divided into two distinct dialects, the polite and vulgar, the latter is further removed from the former, than that is from the Songskrit : it is into the first of these, that many Songskrit works have been translated, and to which I alluded in speaking of its richness. The vulgar, or low Bengalee, is merely used and most probably merely calculated for the common and lower office of life : for as the vulgar have but few ideas they have in all countries but a limited extent of language to express them.' The Vocabulary included the tat-sama words as also the common colloquial words such as motā, motasotā, hatabhāgā, abhāgā, banka, benka, hela, kait, etc..
James Mcintosh made an attempt to work out a dictionary of the languages of the Indian sub-continent—both state-wise and region-wise. However, his efforts fell through.21
John Leadon (1775-1811), a
medical practitioner by profession and an exponent of Bengali language,
compiled a list of Chakma, Kuki and Tripura vocabularies from the remote areas
Thomas Herbert Lewin wrote
'Hill Tracts of Chittagong and the dwellers therein with Comparative
Vocabularies' in 1874.24 It contained vocabularies of the rural
areas of hill tracts of Chittagong. T. H. Lewin also compiled a collection of
two hundred tribal proverbs in 'Hill Proverbs of the Chittagong Hill Tract' (
W.W. Hunter (1840-1900),
Director-General of Statistics to the Government of India, in his A Statistical
Account of Bengal (
J. D- Anderson, a British civilian, recorded the vocabularies of the rural people of the hill Tippera in 'A Short List of Words of the Hill Tippera Language'. It was published with English synonyms from the Asiatic Society of Calcutta in 1885.26
Frederik Eden Pargiter (1852-1927). Fellow of the University of Calcutta and Secretary to the Asiatic Society of Bengal, published his Notes on a Chittagong Dialect (1886) in the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal.27 His 'Vocabulary of Peculiar Vernacular Bengali Words' was the maiden venture of its kind in the Indo-Pak sub-continent (1923).28 It has been recognised as the first attempt at a dictionary in regional Bengali. In a review of this article, published in the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, W. Sutton Page wrote :
‘In this very useful vocabulary Mr. Pergiter has recorded the meanings of a number of Bengali words which are not to be found in Haughton's Bengali Dictionary or in the Prakrtivada-Abladhana of Syamacaran Karmakar or in the Prakrtibodha-Abhidhana of Asutos Deb. Many of the words and meanings he records are, however, to be found in later Bengali Dictionaries, e.g.. in that of Jnanendramohan Das, the most practically valuable of existing dictionaries. In most cases the compiler has noted the district of Bengal in which he found the word used....' 29
Page further commented,
'While this is often
useful as evidence that the word is current in a particular district, it is in
many cases apt to be somewhat misleading. For example,
At the end of his review. Page remarked :
"But these are small
matter compared with the value of the list of words to students of Bengali—a
value which is due to the fact that it records observations of usage made over
a number of years in nearly every part of
The modern Indian languages are studied for the first time in some details by John Beames, a member of the Bengal Civil Service, in his A Comparative Grammar of the Modern Aryan Languages of India (1872-1879). He recognised seven primary members of the Indo-Aryan family, viz., Hindi, Bengali, Marathi, Panjabi, Sindhi, Gujarati and Oriya. He emphasized the importance of consulting dialects in linguistic study. His work gave statements of major dialects of each Indo-Aryan language where Bengali showed a bewildering range of dialectal forms. His Bengali Grammar was first published in 1891. He wrote about the aim of his grammar in its Preface :
'I have specially aimed at
making the working useful to those who desire to understand the spoken
As regards the purpose, Beames remarked :
‘An important feature in the Grammar is the constant reference to colloquial forms. I am aware that many Bengali savants have a prejudice against such forms, and it must be admitted that they are unsuited for literary composition. But to omit or disparage them would be to do injustice to the language....and it is I think the duty of a grammarian to exhibit to the utmost of his ability all forms and phrases of the language.' 33
George Abraham Grierson
(1851 -1941), an active member of the Indian Civil Service, published Bihar
Peasant Life (1885) which constitutes a linguistic-geographical study of
vocabulary drawing upon materials he collected on ceremonies, festivals,
religious rites and superstitions from the rural life of
Grierson's Linguistic Survey of India (Volume V, 1903) still remains the standard reference work on which many of the more recent studies have been based. In his Survey, he presents samples of Western Bengali, South-Western Bengali. Northern Bengali. Rajbangshi and Eastern Bengali.
His classification is based more on geographical distribution than on structural criteria. According to his Survey,